[Bug sanitizer/107374] New: Please expand the size of flag_sanitize to uint64_t

[Bug sanitizer/107374] New: Please expand the size of flag_sanitize to uint64_t

[ashimida at linux dot alibaba.com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107374

            Bug ID: 107374
           Summary: Please expand the size of flag_sanitize to uint64_t
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: sanitizer
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ashimida at linux dot alibaba.com
                CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
                    jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Currently, the size of flag_sanitize is 32 bits, and new options
such as -fsanitize=kcfi cannot be accommodated in sanitize_code.
Could it be scaled up to 64 bit?

Thanks, Dan.

Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107048

[Bug sanitizer/107374] Please expand the size of flag_sanitize to uint64_t

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107374

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We don't do such things just for case, rather changes like that are done as
part of a patch that adds the first thing that needs it.

[Bug sanitizer/107374] Please expand the size of flag_sanitize to uint64_t

[ashimida at linux dot alibaba.com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107374

--- Comment #2 from ashimida <ashimida at linux dot alibaba.com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> We don't do such things just for case, rather changes like that are done as
> part of a patch that adds the first thing that needs it.

Ok, got it, thanks a lot :)

Dan.

[Bug sanitizer/107374] Please expand the size of flag_sanitize to uint64_t

[xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107374

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Invalid then.