public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/107685] New: [C++23] P2647 - Permitting static constexpr variables in constexpr functions
@ 2022-11-14 18:30 mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-11-14 18:30 ` [Bug c++/107685] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-14 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107685

            Bug ID: 107685
           Summary: [C++23] P2647 - Permitting static constexpr variables
                    in constexpr functions
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

See <https://wg21.link/p2647>.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/107685] [C++23] P2647 - Permitting static constexpr variables in constexpr functions
  2022-11-14 18:30 [Bug c++/107685] New: [C++23] P2647 - Permitting static constexpr variables in constexpr functions mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-14 18:30 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-11-19  9:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-11-28 22:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-14 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107685

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-14
             Blocks|                            |98940
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Patch: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/605773.html>.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940
[Bug 98940] Implement C++23 language features

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/107685] [C++23] P2647 - Permitting static constexpr variables in constexpr functions
  2022-11-14 18:30 [Bug c++/107685] New: [C++23] P2647 - Permitting static constexpr variables in constexpr functions mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-11-14 18:30 ` [Bug c++/107685] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-19  9:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-11-28 22:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-19  9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107685

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32d16fe9d7e347bc58e7fad316ed7923e1d0f65c

commit r13-4161-g32d16fe9d7e347bc58e7fad316ed7923e1d0f65c
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Sat Nov 19 09:26:44 2022 +0100

    c++: Implement C++23 P2647R1 - Permitting static constexpr variables in
constexpr functions

    The following patch implements this paper.
    Per further discussions it is implemented for C++23 only, so isn't
    treated as a DR, e.g. because the part of the standard the paper is
    changing didn't even exist in C++20.
    And we gave up on trying to implement it as a pedwarn rather than
    error for C++20 and older, because of implicit constexpr lambdas or
    -fimplicit-constexpr reasons.
    For C++20 and older, the only change is that passing through
    definitions of static or thread_local vars usable in constant expressions
    is now accepted in statement expressions if they aren't inside of constexpr
    or consteval functions.

    2022-11-19  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

    gcc/c-family/
            * c-cppbuiltin.cc (c_cpp_builtins): Bump __cpp_constexpr
            value from 202207L to 202211L.
    gcc/cp/
            * constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_constant_expression): Implement C++23
            P2647R1 - Permitting static constexpr variables in constexpr
functions.
            Allow DECL_EXPRs of decl_constant_var_p static or thread_local
vars.
            (potential_constant_expression_1): Similarly, except use
            decl_maybe_constant_var_p instead of decl_constant_var_p if
            processing_template_decl.
    gcc/testsuite/
            * g++.dg/cpp23/constexpr-nonlit17.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp23/constexpr-nonlit18.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp23/feat-cxx2b.C: Adjust expected __cpp_constexpr
            value.
            * g++.dg/ext/stmtexpr19.C: Don't expect an error.
            * g++.dg/ext/stmtexpr25.C: New test.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/107685] [C++23] P2647 - Permitting static constexpr variables in constexpr functions
  2022-11-14 18:30 [Bug c++/107685] New: [C++23] P2647 - Permitting static constexpr variables in constexpr functions mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-11-14 18:30 ` [Bug c++/107685] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-11-19  9:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-28 22:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-28 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107685

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |13.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-28 22:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-14 18:30 [Bug c++/107685] New: [C++23] P2647 - Permitting static constexpr variables in constexpr functions mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-14 18:30 ` [Bug c++/107685] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-19  9:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-28 22:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).