public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107815] 20_util/to_chars/float128_c++23.cc FAILs
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:28:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107815-4-LBLXFUSPJX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107815-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107815

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Can you please uncomment the
//    std::cout << i << ' ' << std::string_view (str1, ptr1) << '\n';
and
//    std::cout << i << ' ' << std::string_view (str1, ptr5) << '\n';
lines in the test, so that it is clear at least which test it is on?
If line 66 fails, it is a fixed printing test trying to verify
that the string created by line 60 was actually the minimal.
On SPARC Solaris, I assume long double is IEEE quad, and it is the shortest
version, so should use ryu library for both cases.
Line 74 failure is about whether the created string can be read back,
in that case for IEEE quad fast_float library can't be used and so it should
use newlocale/uselocale/strtold/uselocale/freelocale, or if the OS doesn't
support newlocale/uselocale/freelocale most likely just strtod with lost
precision (so in that case the test would fail) on line 74.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-22 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-22 13:46 [Bug libstdc++/107815] New: " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-22 13:47 ` [Bug libstdc++/107815] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-22 14:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-11-22 16:10 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-11-22 17:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-23 13:10 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-11-23 15:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-23 15:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-23 15:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-23 15:58 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-11-23 16:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-24  9:03 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-11-24  9:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-24  9:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-24  9:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-27 20:40 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2022-11-27 20:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-27 21:16 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2022-11-28  9:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-28  9:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-28 13:04 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2023-04-26  6:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-09 12:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-27  9:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-21  9:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-107815-4-LBLXFUSPJX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).