public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/108152] New: gcc.dg/pr71558.c fails for LLP64
@ 2022-12-17 7:26 nightstrike at gmail dot com
2022-12-17 7:30 ` [Bug testsuite/108152] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: nightstrike at gmail dot com @ 2022-12-17 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108152
Bug ID: 108152
Summary: gcc.dg/pr71558.c fails for LLP64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nightstrike at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc.dg/pr71558.c has the following lines:
__SIZE_TYPE__ strlen (const char *);
void *malloc (__SIZE_TYPE__);
__SIZE_TYPE__ b = strlen (a);
These are good in that they support LLP64 through size_t, however they fail
because this test case is compiled with -ansi. When using -ansi, the following
warnings appear:
gcc.dg/pr71558.c:6:1: error: ISO C90 does not support 'long long' [-Wlong-long]
gcc.dg/pr71558.c:7:1: error: ISO C90 does not support 'long long' [-Wlong-long]
gcc.dg/pr71558.c:14:1: error: ISO C90 does not support 'long long'
[-Wlong-long]
And of course, on LLP64 systems, __SIZE_TYPE__ is in fact a long long.
Hopefully, -ansi can just be removed from the compile options, although I don't
know how to do that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/108152] gcc.dg/pr71558.c fails for LLP64
2022-12-17 7:26 [Bug testsuite/108152] New: gcc.dg/pr71558.c fails for LLP64 nightstrike at gmail dot com
@ 2022-12-17 7:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-21 3:49 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
2022-12-30 1:26 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-17 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108152
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
{ dg-options "" }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/108152] gcc.dg/pr71558.c fails for LLP64
2022-12-17 7:26 [Bug testsuite/108152] New: gcc.dg/pr71558.c fails for LLP64 nightstrike at gmail dot com
2022-12-17 7:30 ` [Bug testsuite/108152] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-21 3:49 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
2022-12-30 1:26 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: nightstrike at gmail dot com @ 2022-12-21 3:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108152
--- Comment #2 from nightstrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> { dg-options "" }
That would remove every option, no? Do others matter, like -pedantic, or
whatever else is there?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/108152] gcc.dg/pr71558.c fails for LLP64
2022-12-17 7:26 [Bug testsuite/108152] New: gcc.dg/pr71558.c fails for LLP64 nightstrike at gmail dot com
2022-12-17 7:30 ` [Bug testsuite/108152] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-21 3:49 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
@ 2022-12-30 1:26 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: nightstrike at gmail dot com @ 2022-12-30 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108152
nightstrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |10walls at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from nightstrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> { dg-options "" }
So just to be pedantic (pun intended!), the options currently in use are:
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -ansi -pedantic-errors
If we use dg-options "", both -ansi and -pedantic-errors are removed.
-fdiagnostics-plain-output stays. Is this ok?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-30 1:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-12-17 7:26 [Bug testsuite/108152] New: gcc.dg/pr71558.c fails for LLP64 nightstrike at gmail dot com
2022-12-17 7:30 ` [Bug testsuite/108152] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-21 3:49 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
2022-12-30 1:26 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).