public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108360] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os since r13-2048-g418b71c0d535bf
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:45:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-108360-4-C9zNYV05O1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-108360-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108360

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The first difference with r13-2048 is during fre3:
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ marking outgoing edge 6 -> 1 executable
 RPO iteration over 5 blocks visited 5 blocks in total discovering 5 executable
blocks iterating 1.0 times, a block was visited max. 1 times
 RPO tracked 25 values available at 18 locations and 25 lattice elements
 Replaced (int) _6 with _7 in all uses of _24 = (int) _6;
-gimple_simplified to if (_6 == 0)
+gimple_simplified to if (_22 < 0)
 Replaced (short int) _6 with h_23 in all uses of _25 = (short int) _6;
 Removing dead stmt _25 = (short int) _6;
 Removing dead stmt _24 = (int) _6;
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ int main ()
   _7 = (int) _6;
   # RANGE [irange] short int [-INF, +INF] NONZERO 0x10
   h_23 = (short int) _6;
-  if (_6 == 0)
+  if (_22 < 0)
     goto <bb 3>; [50.00%]
   else
     goto <bb 4>; [50.00%]
Given:
  _3 = _22 >= 0;
  _4 = (char) _3;
  f.5_5 = (unsigned char) _3;
  _6 = f.5_5 << 4;
  h_23 = (short int) _6;
and range of f.5_5 being [0, 1] that change is certainly correct.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-10 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-10 13:10 [Bug tree-optimization/108360] New: Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os (trunk vs. 12.2.0) yann at ywg dot ch
2023-01-10 14:48 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108360] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os since r13-2048-g418b71c0d535bf marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-10 17:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-10 17:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-10 17:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-01-10 19:18 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-01-10 19:26 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-01-10 19:28 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-03-27 11:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-08 14:37 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-26  6:57 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108360] [13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-27  9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-07  8:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-09  1:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-21  9:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108360] [13/14/15 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-108360-4-C9zNYV05O1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).