[Bug target/108396] [12/13 Regression] PPCLE: vec_vsubcuq missing since r12-5752-gd08236359eb229

["carll at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108396

Carl Love <carll at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |carll at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #9 from Carl Love <carll at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I made a copy of rs6000-overload.def and then with a series of emacs macros
converted the list of builtins to a script to grep for the builtins in the test
directory.  Specifically from rs6000-overload.def:

[BCDADD, __builtin_bcdadd, __builtin_vec_bcdadd]
  vsq __builtin_vec_bcdadd (vsq, vsq, const int);
    BCDADD_V1TI
  vuc __builtin_vec_bcdadd (vuc, vuc, const int);
    BCDADD_V16QI

[BCDADD_EQ, __builtin_bcdadd_eq, __builtin_vec_bcdadd_eq]
  signed int __builtin_vec_bcdadd_eq (vsq, vsq, const int);
    BCDADD_EQ_V1TI
  signed int __builtin_vec_bcdadd_eq (vuc, vuc, const int);
    BCDADD_EQ_V16QI

....

Was converted to the bash script:

rm -f ../test1_not_found 

NOT_FOUND='0       0       0'
check_name () {
  str1=$(grep -r  $1 * | wc)

#  echo " output of command: $str1"

  if [[ "$str1" == *"$NOT_FOUND"* ]]; then
    echo "$1 not found" >> ../test1_not_found
  fi
}

check_name "__builtin_bcdadd" "__builtin_vec_bcdadd"

check_name "__builtin_bcdadd_eq" "__builtin_vec_bcdadd_eq"

....

The script is passed the user built-in name ($str1) and the internal built-in
name ($str2).  I ran the script in directory gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc
and it identified two tests ($str1) as not showing up in a test file.  The
tests were:  __builtin_bcdsub_ge and __builtin_bcdsub_le.

I figure if the first builtin name has a test associated with it that should be
sufficient.  I will create a patch to add testcases for the two missing
builtin-names.

I did add to the script to see how many definitions have a test for the
built-in name $1 but not the built-in name $2 doesn't show up in a test file. 
My script identified 86 of these cases.  Not sure that we really need to add
test cases for the internal builtin name ($str).  Thoughts?