* [Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181
2023-01-16 6:35 [Bug target/108415] New: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181 linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-01-16 6:36 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-17 10:40 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-16 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415
Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
| |il/gcc-patches/2023-January
| |/609724.html
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2023-01-16
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181
2023-01-16 6:35 [Bug target/108415] New: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181 linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-16 6:36 ` [Bug target/108415] " linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-01-17 10:40 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-18 2:06 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: segher at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-17 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Soft float does not conflict with anything (anything that does not need
FP registers that is). But yes, we really should neuter -mmodulo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181
2023-01-16 6:35 [Bug target/108415] New: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181 linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-16 6:36 ` [Bug target/108415] " linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-17 10:40 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-01-18 2:06 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-18 4:27 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-18 2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #1)
> Soft float does not conflict with anything (anything that does not need
> FP registers that is). But yes, we really should neuter -mmodulo.
The contradictory thing is that we can have TARGET_VSX and TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT
(!TARGET_HARD_FLOAT) together with the proposed option combination. :)
I agree that we should neuter -mmodulo, but note that this ICE isn't -mmodulo
specific.
With some more testings on those flags which the proposed patch (as field URL)
tries to take care of, the ICE can be reproduced with any one of below:
-mcpu=401 -m64 -mmodulo
-mcpu=401 -m64 -mpower9-vector
-mcpu=401 -m64 -mpower9-misc
-mcpu=401 -m64 -mpower8-vector
-mcpu=401 -m64 -mcrypto
For -mcpu=401 -m64 -mpower9-minmax, it has the below error instead of ICE:
f951: Error: power9 target option is incompatible with ‘-mcpu=<xxx>’ for
<xxx> less than power9
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181
2023-01-16 6:35 [Bug target/108415] New: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181 linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-18 2:06 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-01-18 4:27 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-18 6:38 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-18 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2)
> The contradictory thing is that we can have TARGET_VSX and TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT
> (!TARGET_HARD_FLOAT) together with the proposed option combination. :)
I'm not sure what you mean with this comment, but just to be clear, we should
not allow TARGET_VSX and TARGET_SFT_FLOAT (!TARGET_HARD_FLOAT) at the same
time.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181
2023-01-16 6:35 [Bug target/108415] New: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181 linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-18 4:27 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-01-18 6:38 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-01 5:38 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-18 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415
--- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #3)
> (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2)
> > The contradictory thing is that we can have TARGET_VSX and TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT
> > (!TARGET_HARD_FLOAT) together with the proposed option combination. :)
>
> I'm not sure what you mean with this comment, but just to be clear, we
> should not allow TARGET_VSX and TARGET_SFT_FLOAT (!TARGET_HARD_FLOAT) at the
> same time.
Sorry for the confusion and thanks for clarifying, I meant the similar meaning
that: the given option combination, like
-mmodulo -mcpu=401 or -mcpu=401 -mpower9-vector or ...
makes us to have both TARGET_VSX and TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT at the same time, it's
contradictory (shouldn't be allowed as you noted).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181
2023-01-16 6:35 [Bug target/108415] New: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181 linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-18 6:38 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-03-01 5:38 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-26 6:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-03-01 5:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415
Bug 108415 depends on bug 108240, which changed state.
Bug 108240 Summary: [13 Regression] Error message missing since r13-4894-gacc727cf02a144 (then make concealed ICE exposed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108240
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181
2023-01-16 6:35 [Bug target/108415] New: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181 linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-01 5:38 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-04-26 6:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-27 9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-21 9:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-04-26 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|13.0 |13.2
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 13.1 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 13.2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181
2023-01-16 6:35 [Bug target/108415] New: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181 linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-04-26 6:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-27 9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-21 9:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-27 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|13.2 |13.3
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 13.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 13.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181
2023-01-16 6:35 [Bug target/108415] New: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181 linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-27 9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-05-21 9:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-21 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|13.3 |13.4
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 13.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 13.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread