public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108647] [13 Regression] ICE in upper_bound, at value-range.h:950 with -O3 since r13-2974-g67166c9ec35d58ef
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 16:35:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-108647-4-NNJ5NWdztj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-108647-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108647
--- Comment #15 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> Created attachment 54405 [details]
> gcc13-pr108647.patch
>
> Here is what I'm about to test momentarily, though I must say I don't
> understand those operator_cast changes at all. I thought casts are unary
> operators and so I don't understand what kind of range would be op2 in that
> case.
Oh poop, sorry. Unary operators always have the resulting type passed as
VARYING in op2. It would never be undefined. Sorry for the noise; you can
disregard the cast changes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-02 21:21 [Bug tree-optimization/108647] New: [13 Regression] ICE in upper_bound, at value-range.h:950 with -O3 vsevolod.livinskiy at gmail dot com
2023-02-03 1:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108647] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 8:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 9:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108647] [13 Regression] ICE in upper_bound, at value-range.h:950 with -O3 since r13-2974-g67166c9ec35d58ef marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 9:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 9:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 12:46 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 14:54 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-02-03 15:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 15:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 15:20 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-02-03 15:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 15:28 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-02-03 16:16 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 16:31 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 16:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 16:35 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-02-03 20:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 20:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 20:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-04 1:35 ` raj.khem at gmail dot com
2023-02-04 4:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-04 5:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-04 7:26 ` raj.khem at gmail dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-108647-4-NNJ5NWdztj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).