public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108647] [13 Regression] ICE in upper_bound, at value-range.h:950 with -O3 since r13-2974-g67166c9ec35d58ef
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 20:39:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-108647-4-jvQBDIYUsv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-108647-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108647

--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e753080ab8abd4021381699bc7e857f5b4a083c4

commit r13-5698-ge753080ab8abd4021381699bc7e857f5b4a083c4
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Feb 3 21:39:16 2023 +0100

    range-op: Handle op?.undefined_p () in op[12]_range of comparisons
[PR108647]

    As mentioned in the PR, we ICE because lhs is singleton [0, 0]
    or [1, 1] but op2 (or in other cases op1) is undefined and op?.*_bound ()
    ICEs on those because there are no pairs for UNDEFINED.

    The following patch makes us set r to varying or return false in those
    cases.

    2023-02-03  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR tree-optimization/108647
            * range-op.cc (operator_equal::op1_range,
            operator_not_equal::op1_range): Don't test op2 bound
            equality if op2.undefined_p (), instead set_varying.
            (operator_lt::op1_range, operator_le::op1_range,
            operator_gt::op1_range, operator_ge::op1_range): Return false if
            op2.undefined_p ().
            (operator_lt::op2_range, operator_le::op2_range,
            operator_gt::op2_range, operator_ge::op2_range): Return false if
            op1.undefined_p ().

            * g++.dg/torture/pr108647.C: New test.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-03 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-02 21:21 [Bug tree-optimization/108647] New: [13 Regression] ICE in upper_bound, at value-range.h:950 with -O3 vsevolod.livinskiy at gmail dot com
2023-02-03  1:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108647] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03  8:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03  9:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108647] [13 Regression] ICE in upper_bound, at value-range.h:950 with -O3 since r13-2974-g67166c9ec35d58ef marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03  9:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03  9:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 12:46 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 14:54 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-02-03 15:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 15:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 15:20 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-02-03 15:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 15:28 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-02-03 16:16 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 16:31 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 16:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 16:35 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 20:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03 20:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-02-03 20:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-04  1:35 ` raj.khem at gmail dot com
2023-02-04  4:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-04  5:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-04  7:26 ` raj.khem at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-108647-4-jvQBDIYUsv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).