public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/108665] New: Depenency checking: Run-time loop reversal instead of creating a temporary
@ 2023-02-03 21:47 tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-02-03 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108665
Bug ID: 108665
Summary: Depenency checking: Run-time loop reversal instead of
creating a temporary
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In the Fortran front end, we could sometimes reverse loops at runtime if
dependency analysis shows that either a forward or a backward loop would have
no dependencies.
Example code:
module x
implicit none
contains
subroutine foo(a,i,j,n)
integer, intent(in) :: i, j, n
real, dimension(:), intent(inout) :: a
a(i:i+n-1) = a(j:j+n-1) + 10.
end subroutine foo
subroutine bar(a,i,j,n)
real, dimension(:), intent(inout) :: a
integer,intent(in) :: i, j, n
integer :: k
if (i <= j) then
do k=0, n-1, 1
a(i+k) = a(j+k) + 10.
end do
else
do k=n-1,0,-1
a(i+k) = a(j+k) + 10.
end do
end if
end subroutine bar
end module x
where we create a temporary in foo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-02-03 21:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-03 21:47 [Bug fortran/108665] New: Depenency checking: Run-time loop reversal instead of creating a temporary tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).