public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108846] std::copy, std::copy_n and std::copy_backward on potentially overlapping subobjects Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:20:39 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-108846-4-BufpxOcdKP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-108846-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108846 Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2023-02-23 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I don't think we need the ABI keyword here, the library can just avoid the optimization for distance == 1. That has no ABI impact.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-23 17:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-02-18 21:22 [Bug libstdc++/108846] New: std::copy, std::copy_n " arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com 2023-02-18 21:55 ` [Bug libstdc++/108846] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-18 21:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-18 22:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-20 8:38 ` de34 at live dot cn 2023-02-20 23:42 ` dangelog at gmail dot com 2023-02-21 1:58 ` de34 at live dot cn 2023-02-21 7:21 ` [Bug libstdc++/108846] std::copy, std::copy_n and std::copy_backward " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-23 17:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-02-23 17:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-23 17:27 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-23 17:29 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com 2023-02-24 19:31 ` dangelog at gmail dot com 2023-02-25 9:06 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-25 9:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-25 11:40 ` dangelog at gmail dot com 2023-02-25 14:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-25 14:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-25 14:19 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-25 14:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-28 9:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-03-02 10:49 ` dangelog at gmail dot com 2023-03-02 11:19 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-20 13:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-20 14:12 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com 2023-04-20 17:10 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-20 17:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-18 14:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-18 14:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-108846-4-BufpxOcdKP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).