public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/108911] New: 0xe+100 gives talks about an impossible literal operator in error message
@ 2023-02-23 21:54 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-09 4:05 ` [Bug c++/108911] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-02-23 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108911
Bug ID: 108911
Summary: 0xe+100 gives talks about an impossible literal
operator in error message
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Take:
```
int a = 0xe+100;
```
The C++ front-end gives:
<source>:1:11: error: unable to find numeric literal operator 'operator""+100'
1 | int a = 0xe+100;
| ^~~~~~~
But there is no way to have a numeric literal operator named that ..
Note erroring out is correct, I am just saying the diagnostic should be
improved.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/108911] 0xe+100 gives talks about an impossible literal operator in error message
2023-02-23 21:54 [Bug c++/108911] New: 0xe+100 gives talks about an impossible literal operator in error message pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-09 4:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-09 4:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-09 4:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-09 4:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108911
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |xmh970252187 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 112423 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/108911] 0xe+100 gives talks about an impossible literal operator in error message
2023-02-23 21:54 [Bug c++/108911] New: 0xe+100 gives talks about an impossible literal operator in error message pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-09 4:05 ` [Bug c++/108911] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-09 4:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-09 4:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-09 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108911
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2023-11-09
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed via the dup.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/108911] 0xe+100 gives talks about an impossible literal operator in error message
2023-02-23 21:54 [Bug c++/108911] New: 0xe+100 gives talks about an impossible literal operator in error message pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-09 4:05 ` [Bug c++/108911] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-09 4:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-09 4:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-09 4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108911
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note clang has a decent error message for `0xe+100` but has just as bad one for
`123_to.`
Full testcase for a few:
```
int a = 0xe+100;
int b = 123_to.;
int c = 0xe_100e+10;
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-09 4:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-23 21:54 [Bug c++/108911] New: 0xe+100 gives talks about an impossible literal operator in error message pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-09 4:05 ` [Bug c++/108911] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-09 4:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-09 4:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).