public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/109359] [12/13 Regression] Compile-time rounding of double literal to float is incorrect with -frounding-math Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 10:03:49 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-109359-4-1EmFkFQZFm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-109359-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109359 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Ah, cp/constexpr.cc already uses fold_binary_initializer_loc if -fconstexpr-fp-except. That will turn the -frounding-math temporarily off for binary operations. For this PR guess we need to use fold_init or fold_build1_initializer_loc instead of fold or fold_build1 in the NOP_EXPR handling under the same conditions. Plus of course we need to figure out how to fix the issue if we didn't turn those off (we shouldn't consider the initializer constant then but evaluate dynamically).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-14 10:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-03-31 12:33 [Bug c++/109359] New: " rcopley at gmail dot com 2023-03-31 13:23 ` [Bug c++/109359] [12/13 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-03-31 13:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-03-31 14:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-14 9:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-14 10:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-04-14 10:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-14 10:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-08 12:26 ` [Bug c++/109359] [12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-05 18:24 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-05 18:34 ` [Bug c++/109359] [12/13 " jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-05 18:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-05 18:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-05 21:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-05 22:25 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-05 22:25 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-05 22:26 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-109359-4-1EmFkFQZFm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).