public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/109816] [13/14 Regression] r14-321 fix for PR108969 breaks NVPTX offloading due to __asm (".globl _ZSt21ios_base_library_initv")
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 20:16:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109816-4-QDy6CVGiKb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109816-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816

--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > And we emit all toplevel asms into the offloading target code?
> > Or how does it make into PTX?
> 
> It seems as if this is always written (once). Thus, the minimal change would
> be the following. We could save some bits by not writing
> lto_output_toplevel_asms without '-flto', but I think that is not really
> needed, given that top-level asm are rather rare and small.
> 
> --- a/gcc/lto-cgraph.cc
> +++ b/gcc/lto-cgraph.cc
> @@ -1587,3 +1587,5 @@ input_cgraph_1 (struct lto_file_decl_data *file_data,
>  
> +#ifndef ACCEL_COMPILER
>    lto_input_toplevel_asms (file_data, file_data->order_base);
> +#endif

The above can work only if toplevel asms are in separate section and so
inputting it or not doesn't affect input of other data.
I think it would be better to also not to stream it if lto_stream_offload_p.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-11 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-11 17:55 [Bug libstdc++/109816] New: [14 " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 18:02 ` [Bug libstdc++/109816] [13/14 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 18:40 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 18:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 20:10 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 20:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-05-11 20:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 21:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 21:37 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-12  7:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-12 14:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16  9:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16 13:24 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-109816-4-QDy6CVGiKb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).