public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/109821] New: vect: Different output with -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize compared to -O2
@ 2023-05-12  2:30 yinyuefengyi at gmail dot com
  2023-05-12  2:56 ` [Bug middle-end/109821] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: yinyuefengyi at gmail dot com @ 2023-05-12  2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109821

            Bug ID: 109821
           Summary: vect: Different output with -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize
                    compared to -O2
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: yinyuefengyi at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

For this test code, it aims to generate special patterns different with memcpy
or memmove, it generates different results with -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize
compared to -O2, is this a bug of vectorizer that lack of checking the gap of
op-src should be larger than vector mode size (here only do vectorize if op -
src > 16)?

copy.cpp:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <cstdint>
#include <stdlib.h>

#define UNALIGNED_LOAD64(_p) (*reinterpret_cast<const uint64_t *>(_p))
#define UNALIGNED_STORE64(_p, _val) (*reinterpret_cast<uint64_t *>(_p) =
(_val))

__attribute__((__noinline__))
static void IncrementalCopyFastPath(const char* src, char* op, int len) {
    while (op - src < 8) {
        UNALIGNED_STORE64(op, UNALIGNED_LOAD64(src));
        len -= op - src;
        op += op - src;
    }
    while (len > 0) {
        UNALIGNED_STORE64(op, UNALIGNED_LOAD64(src));
        src += 8;
        op += 8;
        len -= 8;
    }
}

int main ()
{
  char src[] = "123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstu";
  char *op = src+12;
  char * dst = op;
  IncrementalCopyFastPath (src, op, 36);
  int i = 0;
  while (i < 36)
    {printf("%x ", *(dst+i)), i++;}
  printf("\n");
  return 0;
}


$ gcc copy.cpp -O2 -o a.out.good
$ ./a.out.good
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 61 62 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 61 62 30 31
32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 61 62
$ gcc copy.cpp -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize  -o a.out.bad
$ ./a.out.bad
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 61 62 63 64 65 66 34 35 36 37 38 39 61 62 63 64
65 66 73 74 75 76 38 39 61 62


gimple after t.vect:

IncrementalCopyFastPath.constprop (const char * src, char * op)
{
...
  <bb 2> [local count: 118111600]:
  _4 = src_8(D) + 8;
  if (_4 != op_9(D))    // <=  the check should be op_9 > src_8 + 16 here?
    goto <bb 16>; [80.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 10>; [20.00%]
...
}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-12  3:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-12  2:30 [Bug c++/109821] New: vect: Different output with -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize compared to -O2 yinyuefengyi at gmail dot com
2023-05-12  2:56 ` [Bug middle-end/109821] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-12  3:13 ` yinyuefengyi at gmail dot com
2023-05-12  3:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-12  3:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).