public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/109893] New: [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 @ 2023-05-17 15:15 theodort at inf dot ethz.ch 2023-05-17 15:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/109893] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 more replies) 0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: theodort at inf dot ethz.ch @ 2023-05-17 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109893 Bug ID: 109893 Summary: [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: theodort at inf dot ethz.ch Target Milestone: --- void foo(void); void bar(void); static char a; static int b, e, f; static int *c = &b, *g; int main() { int *j = 0; if (a) { g = 0; if (c) bar(); } else { j = &e; c = 0; } if (c == &f == b || c == &e) ; else __builtin_unreachable(); if (g || e) { if (j == &e || j == 0) ; else foo(); } a = 4; } gcc -O3: main: cmpb $0, a(%rip) je .L2 xorl %esi, %esi cmpq $0, c(%rip) movq %rsi, g(%rip) je .L7 pushq %rdx call bar movb $4, a(%rip) xorl %eax, %eax popq %rcx ret .L2: xorl %eax, %eax movq %rax, c(%rip) .L7: movb $4, a(%rip) xorl %eax, %eax ret c: .quad b gcc-trunk -O3 main: subq $8, %rsp cmpb $0, a(%rip) je .L2 xorl %edx, %edx cmpq $0, c(%rip) movq %rdx, g(%rip) je .L6 call bar xorl %eax, %eax .L4: cmpq $0, g(%rip) je .L9 .L6: movb $4, a(%rip) xorl %eax, %eax addq $8, %rsp ret .L2: xorl %eax, %eax movq %rax, c(%rip) movl $e, %eax jmp .L4 .L9: cmpl $0, e(%rip) je .L6 testq %rax, %rax je .L6 cmpq $e, %rax je .L6 call foo jmp .L6 c: .quad b Bisects to: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=f828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/109893] [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 2023-05-17 15:15 [Bug tree-optimization/109893] New: [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 theodort at inf dot ethz.ch @ 2023-05-17 15:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-09 6:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-17 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109893 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |missed-optimization Last reconfirmed| |2023-05-17 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|--- |14.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed. A minor regression I suspect. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/109893] [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 2023-05-17 15:15 [Bug tree-optimization/109893] New: [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 theodort at inf dot ethz.ch 2023-05-17 15:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/109893] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-08-09 6:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-12 12:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-08-09 6:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109893 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- # j_10 = PHI <0B(4), &e(6)> ... _21 = j_10 == 0B; _22 = j_10 == &e; _23 = _21 | _22; The only pass which is able to optmize the above is pre. That is take: ``` int e; void g(); int f(int a, int b) { int *t; if (a) t = 0; else t = &e; if (b) g(); int t1 = t == 0; int t2 = t == &e; return t1|t2; } ``` ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/109893] [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 2023-05-17 15:15 [Bug tree-optimization/109893] New: [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 theodort at inf dot ethz.ch 2023-05-17 15:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/109893] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-09 6:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-12 12:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-08 15:36 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-07 7:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/109893] [14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-12 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109893 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- This is a failure to jump-thread because of size limits. If we'd limit the backward threader the same way as the forward threader we'd optimize this (--param fsm-scale-path-stmts=1). --param max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts is 15 --param fsm-scale-path-stmts is 2 but for "true" FSM paths we allow --param max-fsm-thread-path-insns == 100 For non-loop FSM threads we only allow 7 stmts (and we lack the forward thread estimation of the number of stmts we likely eliminate). Increasing --param max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts to 17 also works to resolve the regression. But IMHO the scale param should simply go - we have the other limit for paths across a backedge when threading multi-way branches. The argument for the scaling is /* The generic copier used by the backthreader does not re-use an existing threading path to reduce code duplication. So for that case, drastically reduce the number of statements we are allowed to copy. */ that sounds more like limiting overall threading rather than individual ones. I'll adjust fsm-scale-path-stmts to be more finely tunable. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/109893] [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 2023-05-17 15:15 [Bug tree-optimization/109893] New: [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 theodort at inf dot ethz.ch ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2024-01-12 12:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-08 15:36 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-07 7:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/109893] [14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: law at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-08 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109893 Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/109893] [14/15 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 2023-05-17 15:15 [Bug tree-optimization/109893] New: [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 theodort at inf dot ethz.ch ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2024-03-08 15:36 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-07 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-07 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109893 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|14.0 |14.2 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- GCC 14.1 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 14.2. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-07 7:40 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-05-17 15:15 [Bug tree-optimization/109893] New: [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r14-160-gf828503eeb79ad1f1ada6db7deccc5abcc2f3ca3 theodort at inf dot ethz.ch 2023-05-17 15:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/109893] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-09 6:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-12 12:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-08 15:36 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-07 7:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/109893] [14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).