public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/110033] New: rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray
@ 2023-05-30 3:42 neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com
2023-05-30 3:44 ` [Bug fortran/110033] " neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com @ 2023-05-30 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033
Bug ID: 110033
Summary: rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray
selector should be considered a coarray
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
In the following example, the associate name Y corresponds to a coarray.
According to 11.1.3.3 par. 2 (f2018), Y should be regarded as a coarray,
however gfortran rejects this as invalid.
real :: x[*]
associate (y => x)
y[1] = 1.0
end associate
end
gfortran -fcoarray=lib gfortran-20230529.f90
gfortran-20230529.f90:18:4:
18 | y[1] = 1.0
| 1
Error: Coarray designator at (1) but ‘y’ is not a coarray
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/110033] rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray 2023-05-30 3:42 [Bug fortran/110033] New: rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com @ 2023-05-30 3:44 ` neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com 2023-06-02 17:57 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com @ 2023-05-30 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033 --- Comment #1 from Neil Carlson <neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com> --- This must be related to PR78152 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/110033] rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray 2023-05-30 3:42 [Bug fortran/110033] New: rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com 2023-05-30 3:44 ` [Bug fortran/110033] " neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com @ 2023-06-02 17:57 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-02 17:57 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-17 16:54 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-02 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2023-06-02 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed. There is a check for F2023:C1103 C1103 (R1105) variable shall not be a coindexed object. but that applies to something like 'associate(y => x[1])'. gfortran needs to check that if 'x' in 'associate(y => x)' is a coarray, that its codimension and corank are propagated to 'y'. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/110033] rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray 2023-05-30 3:42 [Bug fortran/110033] New: rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com 2023-05-30 3:44 ` [Bug fortran/110033] " neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com 2023-06-02 17:57 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-02 17:57 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-17 16:54 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-02 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/110033] rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray 2023-05-30 3:42 [Bug fortran/110033] New: rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2023-06-02 17:57 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-17 16:54 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-17 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033 Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks| |87477 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I'm onto it :-) Paul Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 [Bug 87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-17 16:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-05-30 3:42 [Bug fortran/110033] New: rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com 2023-05-30 3:44 ` [Bug fortran/110033] " neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com 2023-06-02 17:57 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-02 17:57 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-17 16:54 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).