public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/110077] [14 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check FAILs on Solaris
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 22:43:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110077-4-CmVPKIZdhW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-110077-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110077

--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely <redi@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0867d30a68de68f4c809757348447bef94ef1491

commit r14-2661-g0867d30a68de68f4c809757348447bef94ef1491
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Jul 19 21:15:17 2023 +0100

    libstdc++: Do not define inaccurate from_chars for _Float128 [PR110077]

    I think r14-1431-g7037e7b6e4ac41 was wrong to try to define the
    _Float128 overload unconditionally. Not all targets need it, so defining
    the lossy fallback using long double is not useful (and caused an ABI
    change on Solaris x86).

    Making the definition depend on USE_STRTOF128_FOR_FROM_CHARS again
    partially reverts the change for PR 109921, however that should still be
    fixed because the changes to make USE_STRTOF128_FOR_FROM_CHARS depend on
    USE_STRTOD_FOR_FROM_CHARS are not reverted.

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            PR libstdc++/110077
            * src/c++17/floating_from_chars.cc (from_chars): Only define
            _Float128 overload when using __strfromf128.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-19 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01 10:57 [Bug libstdc++/110077] New: " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-01 10:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/110077] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-01 10:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-01 11:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-09 10:17 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-09 12:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-09 12:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-12 11:26 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 12:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 12:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 12:55 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 13:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 14:41 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 14:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 14:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 13:54 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-06-30 14:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-19 20:14 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-19 22:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-07-19 22:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-21 11:35 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-07-21 13:04 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-110077-4-CmVPKIZdhW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).