public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110311] [14 Regression] regression in tree-optimizer
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:02:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110311-4-TiW7bHLhdU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-110311-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110311

--- Comment #50 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
How to proceed here? Since almost exactly a month the current gcc git master
doesn't show this problem anymore, from our CI I can deduce that the version on
July 3rd still failed, while the version on July 10th worked again. Since then
the problem didn't show up again. My guess is that something has changed in the
optimizer again (maybe because of a different problem/regression). Is it worth
to find the offending commit and see when and how it was fixed (maybe even
accidentally), or shall we add a gcc testsuite for regression testing, and
close this issue?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-09  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-19 12:45 [Bug fortran/110311] New: [gfortran 14.0 regression] juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-20  6:29 ` [Bug fortran/110311] " juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-20  7:48 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-20  8:08 ` [Bug fortran/110311] [14 Regression] gfortran 14.0 regression rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-20 10:13 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-20 17:35 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-20 17:38 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-21  6:43 ` manolis.tsamis at vrull dot eu
2023-06-21 12:53 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-21 23:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 11:48 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-22 11:54 ` [Bug fortran/110311] [14 Regression] regression in tree-optimizer juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-23 22:01 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-23 23:23 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-24  9:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/110311] " juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-24 10:33 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-24 11:47 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-24 13:04 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-24 13:09 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-24 13:41 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-24 13:43 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-24 13:46 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-24 18:21 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-24 18:54 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-24 19:16 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 14:39 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-29 17:29 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 17:47 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-29 18:59 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 19:33 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 19:35 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-29 20:07 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 17:45 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 17:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 18:32 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 18:57 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 19:25 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2023-06-30 19:30 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 19:32 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 19:46 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-06-30 19:47 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2023-06-30 20:19 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 21:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 21:48 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-07-01  7:55 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-01  8:09 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-07-06 19:40 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-07-06 19:44 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-07-06 21:18 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-06 21:38 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 12:44 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-08-09  9:02 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de [this message]
2023-08-09  9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-25 21:17 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-08-25 21:18 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-08-25 21:23 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-08-30 12:34 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-09-22 14:56 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2023-10-17 11:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-27 13:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-110311-4-TiW7bHLhdU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).