public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/110361] New: [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b
@ 2023-06-22 11:40 theodort at inf dot ethz.ch
2023-06-22 12:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/110361] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: theodort at inf dot ethz.ch @ 2023-06-22 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361
Bug ID: 110361
Summary: [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when
using __builtin_unreachable since
r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: theodort at inf dot ethz.ch
Target Milestone: ---
https://godbolt.org/z/qab3679sq
Given the following code:
void foo(void);
static int a, b, d, p, k;
static int *c, *e, *g;
static short f;
static unsigned h;
static int **i = &c, **o = &g;
void __assert_fail() __attribute__((__noreturn__));
static void j(char, unsigned r) {
h = r == 0 ?: 2 % r;
int l = h;
if (!(((l) >= 1) && ((l) <= 1))) {
__builtin_unreachable();
}
int m;
*i = &m;
}
static int *n();
static short q(short t) {
*o = &p;
return t;
}
static unsigned s() {
int *j = n();
if (e == 0 || e == &a || e == &d)
;
else
__assert_fail();
return *j;
}
static int *n() {
if (b) {
if (c) __assert_fail();
e = 0;
}
return &k;
}
int main() {
j(q(s()), f);
if (e == 0 || e == &a || e == &d)
;
else
foo();
f = 0;
}
gcc-trunk -O2 does not eliminate the call to foo:
main:
subq $24, %rsp
movq e(%rip), %rax
movswl f(%rip), %edx
testq %rax, %rax
je .L2
cmpq $a, %rax
je .L4
cmpq $d, %rax
jne .L17
.L4:
movq $p, g(%rip)
testl %edx, %edx
je .L18
leaq 12(%rsp), %rdx
movq %rdx, c(%rip)
cmpq $a, %rax
je .L5
cmpq $d, %rax
je .L5
call foo
.L5:
xorl %eax, %eax
movw %ax, f(%rip)
xorl %eax, %eax
addq $24, %rsp
ret
.L18:
leaq 12(%rsp), %rax
movq %rax, c(%rip)
jmp .L5
.L2:
movq $p, g(%rip)
leaq 12(%rsp), %rax
movq %rax, c(%rip)
jmp .L5
.L17:
xorl %eax, %eax
call __assert_fail
gcc-12.3.0 -O2 eliminates the call to foo:
main:
subq $24, %rsp
movq e(%rip), %rax
testq %rax, %rax
je .L2
cmpq $a, %rax
je .L2
cmpq $d, %rax
jne .L14
.L2:
movq $p, g(%rip)
leaq 12(%rsp), %rax
movq %rax, c(%rip)
xorl %eax, %eax
movw %ax, f(%rip)
xorl %eax, %eax
addq $24, %rsp
ret
.L14:
xorl %eax, %eax
call __assert_fail
Bisects to r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/110361] [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b
2023-06-22 11:40 [Bug tree-optimization/110361] New: [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b theodort at inf dot ethz.ch
@ 2023-06-22 12:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-27 9:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-22 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |13.2
Keywords| |missed-optimization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/110361] [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b
2023-06-22 11:40 [Bug tree-optimization/110361] New: [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b theodort at inf dot ethz.ch
2023-06-22 12:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/110361] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-27 9:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-07 9:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-27 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|13.2 |13.3
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 13.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 13.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/110361] [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b
2023-06-22 11:40 [Bug tree-optimization/110361] New: [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b theodort at inf dot ethz.ch
2023-06-22 12:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/110361] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-27 9:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-08-07 9:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-08 15:30 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-21 9:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/110361] [13/14/15 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-08-07 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2023-08-07
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
What is interesting is we have:
```
<bb 7> [local count: 525923045]:
g = &p;
f.0_18 = f;
if (f.0_18 == 0)
goto <bb 8>; [50.00%]
else
goto <bb 13>; [50.00%]
<bb 9> [local count: 225485782]:
g = &p;
f.0_36 = f;
if (f.0_36 == 0)
goto <bb 8>; [50.00%]
else
goto <bb 13>; [50.00%]
```
Those bb's are exactly the same.
Their pred bbs are:
```
<bb 3> [local count: 751619280]:
if (e.4_19 == &a)
goto <bb 9>; [30.00%]
else
goto <bb 4>; [70.00%]
<bb 4> [local count: 526133498]:
if (e.4_19 == &d)
goto <bb 7>; [99.96%]
else
goto <bb 5>; [0.04%]
```
Their succ branch (that matters) is:
```
<bb 13> [local count: 375914866]:
c = &m;
m ={v} {CLOBBER(eol)};
_22 = e.4_19 == &d;
_1 = e.4_19 == &a;
_23 = _1 | _22;
if (_23 != 0)
goto <bb 12>; [25.16%]
else
goto <bb 10>; [74.84%]
```
So coming into bb13, we know that `(e.4_19 == &d) | (e.4_19 == &a)` is true.
Removing the branch to bb 10 which was the call to foo:
<bb 10> [local count: 281323581]:
foo ();
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/110361] [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b
2023-06-22 11:40 [Bug tree-optimization/110361] New: [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b theodort at inf dot ethz.ch
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-08-07 9:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-08 15:30 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-21 9:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/110361] [13/14/15 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: law at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-08 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361
Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/110361] [13/14/15 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b
2023-06-22 11:40 [Bug tree-optimization/110361] New: [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b theodort at inf dot ethz.ch
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-08 15:30 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-05-21 9:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-21 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|13.3 |13.4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 13.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 13.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-21 9:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-22 11:40 [Bug tree-optimization/110361] New: [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b theodort at inf dot ethz.ch
2023-06-22 12:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/110361] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-27 9:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-07 9:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-08 15:30 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-21 9:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/110361] [13/14/15 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).