[Bug c/110732] New: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu (recent regression)

[Bug c/110732] New: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu (recent regression)

[shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110732

            Bug ID: 110732
           Summary: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu (recent
                    regression)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch
  Target Milestone: ---

This looks like a recent regression. gcc at -Os produces the wrong code.

Compiler explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/WWdxfzPrc

$ cat a.c
int printf(const char *, ...);
int a;
char c[] = {0, 0, -4L};
char d, e;
int main() {
  int f;
  int *g = &a;
  *g = 1;
  for (; e <= 2; e++)
    for (;;) {
      {
        {
          int b = c[e];
          f = b < 0 ? b : b >> 6;
        }
        d = f && a;
      }
      break;
    }
  printf("%d\n", d);
}
$
$ gcc-tk -O0 a.c && ./a.out
1
$ gcc-tk -Os a.c && ./a.out
-1
$
$ gcc-tk -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-tk
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/zdata/shaoli/compilers/ccbuilder-compilers/gcc-322d17ae51ea0137167424e0018d7fa355948f9f/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/14.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --disable-multilib --disable-bootstrap
--enable-languages=c,c++
--prefix=/zdata/shaoli/compilers/ccbuilder-compilers/gcc-322d17ae51ea0137167424e0018d7fa355948f9f
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20230711 (experimental) (GCC) 
$

[Bug c/110732] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu (recent regression)

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110732

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
phiopt match-simplify trying:
        b_15 >= 0 ? iftmp.1_16 : 1
Matching expression match.pd:2006, gimple-match-5.cc:23
Matching expression match.pd:2006, gimple-match-5.cc:23
Applying pattern match.pd:5311, gimple-match-1.cc:3381
Applying pattern match.pd:1393, gimple-match-2.cc:7726
Applying pattern match.pd:1901, gimple-match-4.cc:680
Applying pattern match.pd:4781, gimple-match-10.cc:16483
Folded into the sequence:
_11 = b_15 >= 0;
_20 = (int) _11;
_19 = b_15 < 0;
_26 = (int) _19;
_18 = iftmp.1_16 | _26;
statement un-sinked:
iftmp.1_16 = b_15 >> 6;


Before:
  # RANGE [irange] int [0, 1]
  iftmp.1_16 = b_15 >> 6;

Dup of bug 110252.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 110252 ***