public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
@ 2023-09-21 19:06 slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-09-22  5:22 ` [Bug driver/111527] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 more replies)
  0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-09-21 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

            Bug ID: 111527
           Summary: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits
                    too early
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: driver
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Tl;DR:

  linux allows you to pass up to 2MB of command line arguments to the tools
limiting each individual option to 128KB. Unfortunately `gcc` collects all the
options into a single `COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS` variable and hits the smaller 128KB
limit.

  This causes periodic problems for distributions that install each individual
package into a separate directory. One of them is `NixOS`.

  Could `gcc` be amended not to use single limiting `COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS`
variable and use, say, direct arguments to pass options around? Or even use
response file if it hits `-E2BIG`?

  Fake reproducer: 2 huge variables that programs normally accept, but not
`gcc`:

  $ big_100k_var=$(printf "%0*d" 100000 0)

  # this works: 200KB of options for `printf` external command
  $ $(which printf) "%s %s" $big_100k_var $big_100k_var >/dev/null; echo $?
  0

  # this fails: 200KB of options for `gcc`, fails in `cc1`
  $ touch a.c; gcc -c a.c -DA=$big_100k_var -DB=$big_100k_var
  gcc: fatal error: cannot execute 'cc1': execv: Argument list too long
  compilation terminated.

  Thanks!

MOre words

In `nixpkgs` repository each package gets installed into it's own unique
directory:

    /nix/store/hash1-foo/include/foo.h
    /nix/store/hash2-bar/include/bar.h
    ...

If any of those encounter `__FILE__` macros in static inline functions they
usually embed full path to header files into final binaries as is.

I wanted to remap all those paths into form that does not contain hashes:

   
-fmacro-prefix-map=/nix/store/hash1-foo/include/foo.h=/nix/store/00000000-foo/include/foo.h
   
-fmacro-prefix-map=/nix/store/hash2-bar/include/bar.h=/nix/store/00000000-bar/include/bar.h
    ...

When I got to packages that use about ~100 include directories I started
getting  errors from `cc1`:

```
Command line: `gcc -m64 -mcx16 $remap_options
/build/qemu-8.1.0/build/meson-private/tmpbyikv8nc/testfile.c \
  -o /build/qemu-8.1.0/build/meson-private/tmpbyikv8nc/output.exe
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 \
  -O0 -Wl,--start-group -laio -Wl,--end-group -Wl,--allow-shlib-undefined` -> 1
stderr:
gcc: fatal error: cannot execute 'cc1': execv: Argument list too long
compilation terminated.
```

The limit felt too low and I found the `COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS` variable.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
  2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-09-22  5:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-09-22  8:15 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-09-22  5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hm, but the COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS variable is only used for communicating between
the driver and the linker, the options therein are individually passed to the
program execved?

You are maybe looking for the -f*-map options to take a file as input
containing multiple mappings?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
  2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-09-22  5:22 ` [Bug driver/111527] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-09-22  8:15 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-03-16  9:52 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-09-22  8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Hm, but the COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS variable is only used for communicating
> between the driver and the linker, the options therein are individually
> passed to the program execved?

AFAIU the driver sets `COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS` variable and never unsets it. As a
result it affects all the `exevce() calls. Be it `cc1`, `as` or anything else
regardless of the fact if it uses the variable or not. `cc1` is probably the
first casualty.

As a simplistic example here we break `ls` with too large environment file:

    $ COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS=$(printf "%0*d" 200000 0) ls
    -bash: /run/current-system/sw/bin/ls: Argument list too long

> You are maybe looking for the -f*-map options to take a file as input
> containing multiple mappings?

`NixOS` is also occasionally hottong the same limit by passing too many include
an library paths:

    -I/nix/store/hash1-foo/include
    -I/nix/store/hash2-bar/include
    ...
    -L/nix/store/hash1-foo/lib
    -L/nix/store/hash2-bar/lib
    ...
    -Wl,-rpath,/nix/store/hash1-foo/lib
    -Wl,-rpath,/nix/store/hash2-bar/lib

I wonder if we could solve all of these limitations here by at least avoiding
`COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS`.

But otherwise if generic fix is too invasive change then passing a mapping file
should do as well.

What would be an acceptable for of the file? A new option, like?
    -fmacro-prefix-map-file=./foo
with entries of exactly the same form
    $ cat foo
    /nix/store/hash1-foo=/nix/store/00000000-foo
    /nix/store/hash2-bar=/nix/store/00000000-bar
    ...

Or maybe reuse existing -fmacro-prefix-map= and use response-style file input?
Like -fmacro-prefix-map=@./foo.

clang would probably need the same handling if we were to extend the driver.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
  2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-09-22  5:22 ` [Bug driver/111527] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-09-22  8:15 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-16  9:52 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
  2024-03-16  9:53 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com @ 2024-03-16  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

Deepthi H <deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com

--- Comment #3 from Deepthi H <deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com> ---
I have been investigating this issue further. Hence checking the source code
and debugging the gcc sources. However, I wasn't able to find where the
COLLECT_GCC_OPTION has been set to 128kb

I couldn't find it being set in gcc. Can you please let us know how can we
increase the limit of collect options?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
  2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-16  9:52 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
@ 2024-03-16  9:53 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
  2024-03-16 20:18 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com @ 2024-03-16  9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

--- Comment #4 from Deepthi H <deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com> ---
I have been investigating this issue further. Hence checking the source code
and debugging the gcc sources. However, I wasn't able to find where the
COLLECT_GCC_OPTION has been set to 128kb

I couldn't find it being set in gcc. Can you please let us know how can we
increase the limit of collect options?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
  2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-16  9:53 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
@ 2024-03-16 20:18 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-05-06 11:39 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-16 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Deepthi H from comment #4)
> I have been investigating this issue further. Hence checking the source code
> and debugging the gcc sources. However, I wasn't able to find where the
> COLLECT_GCC_OPTION has been set to 128kb
> 
> I couldn't find it being set in gcc. Can you please let us know how can we
> increase the limit of collect options?

The 128K limit against a single environment variable is a linux kernel
limitation set by this define in include/uapi/linux/binfmts.h:

    #define MAX_ARG_STRLEN (PAGE_SIZE * 32)

https://trofi.github.io/posts/299-maximum-argument-count-on-linux-and-in-gcc.html
has more words on that.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
  2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-16 20:18 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-05-06 11:39 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
  2024-05-06 11:42 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com @ 2024-05-06 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

--- Comment #6 from Deepthi H <deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 58107
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58107&action=edit
workaround for gcc driver long argument list error

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
  2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-06 11:39 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
@ 2024-05-06 11:42 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
  2024-05-06 16:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com @ 2024-05-06 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

--- Comment #7 from Deepthi H <deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com> ---
We've a solution for this issue.

When gcc/g++ is called using the @response-file.rsp syntax, gcc should forward
the argument to its subprocesses. Previously the files were expanded which
could lead to excessively long argument lists and 'cc1: execv: Argument list
too long' errors.

In particular, CMake and Ninja tend to create a lot of '-isystem' include
directories, requiring allowing the forwarding in spec files by using %@{i*}.

In xputenv method, If the ENV variable size greater then 128kb then we split
the ENV variable(i.e COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS) where each chunk will be 128kb in
length.

GCC passes the entire command line, including expanded @rsp-files to the
collect2 in environment variable COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS. This can exceed the build
environment's kernel's environment variable length limit. In this workaround,
environment variables longer than 128kb are split into multiple variables and
stitched back together in collect2.

The patch is attached here. 
And, the patch output of the example code given in 'Description' as below:

=======
sunild@BFT-LPT-I-051:~$ $GCC_PATH/gcc -c a.c -DA=$big_100k_var
-DB=$big_100k_var -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/sunild/GCC_Driver/bin/home/sunild/GCC_Driver/build/bin/gcc
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/sunild/GCC_Driver/build
--enable-languages=c --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.1 20240426 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS_0='-c' '-D'
'A=00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS_1=000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS_COUNT=2

=======

Let us know your comments on this solution. Such a solution is acceptable to
change the gcc driver?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
  2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-06 11:42 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
@ 2024-05-06 16:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-05-15 10:58 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-06 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Deepthi H from comment #7)
>  
> Let us know your comments on this solution. Such a solution is acceptable to
> change the gcc driver?

Seems better to place the arguments in a file instead and just pass around that
file name instead of passing all arguments via an env variable.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
  2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-06 16:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-05-15 10:58 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
  2024-05-15 11:00 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
  2024-05-18 21:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com @ 2024-05-15 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

--- Comment #9 from Deepthi H <deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 58212
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58212&action=edit
With_Files_Workaround_for_GCC_ArgumentLongList

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
  2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-15 10:58 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
@ 2024-05-15 11:00 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
  2024-05-18 21:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com @ 2024-05-15 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

--- Comment #10 from Deepthi H <deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com> ---
As suggested, We've updated the patch to place the arguments in a file instead
of passing it from an env variable.
When the COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS is <128kb the env variable is used and when the
size >128kb arguments will be moved to a file.

In Collect2: We copy back the contents of the arguments from file into a buffer
and pass it on to the Linker.

See the updated patch :
With_Files_Workaround_for_GCC_driver_LongArgumentList.patch

The output of the example program in descripton section as below: 
=============================================================
$big_100k_var=$(printf "%0*d" 100000 0)
$<<GCC_PATH_With_Fix>>/gcc -c a.c -DA=$big_100k_var -DB=$big_100k_var -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/sunild/Gcc_Driver_with_FILE/install/home/Gcc_Driver_with_FILE/build/bin/gcc
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/Gcc_Driver_with_FILE/build
--enable-languages=c --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240513 (experimental) (GCC)
/home/Gcc_Driver_with_FILE/install/home/Gcc_Driver_with_FILE/build/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/15.0.0/cc1
-quiet -v -imultiarch x86_64-linux-gnu -iprefix
/home/Gcc_Driver_with_FILE/install/home/Gcc_Driver_with_FILE/build/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/15.0.0/
-D A=00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
....
....
<<trimmed output>>
....
....
0 -D B=000000000000000000000000000...
....
....
<<trimmed output>>
....
....
00000000000 a.c -quiet -dumpbase a.c -dumpbase-ext .c -mtune=generic
-march=x86-64 -version -o /tmp/cc7Ox5mH.s
=============================================================

Please let us know this solution is ok.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early
  2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-15 11:00 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
@ 2024-05-18 21:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-18 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-05-18
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note using "/tmp/rsp.txt" is not acceptable at all since there might be a few
linking happening on the machine. You should use make_at_file (which will make
either a tmp file which will be deleted at the end compiling or an .args.N file
which can be looked at if used with -save-temps) instead from gcc.cc and then
pass the filename to collect2 as "@filename" and then inside collect2 expand as
needed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-18 21:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-21 19:06 [Bug driver/111527] New: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-22  5:22 ` [Bug driver/111527] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-22  8:15 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-16  9:52 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
2024-03-16  9:53 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
2024-03-16 20:18 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-06 11:39 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
2024-05-06 11:42 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
2024-05-06 16:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-15 10:58 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
2024-05-15 11:00 ` deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com
2024-05-18 21:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).