public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112598] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl512b
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 08:43:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-112598-4-GlTf8XDN1G@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-112598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598

--- Comment #13 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It looks like the takeaway from the other thread is that there are many
likewise assumptions about masked stores in the middle end.  It's probably
difficult to get them all right in a short time.  Therefore I suppose our only
choice is to go "UNSPEC" as well for now.  I'm also testing some quick hacks
locally.

What's the problem about the pred_store pattern you mention?  That we would
lose that particular optimization?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-27  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-17 21:18 [Bug target/112598] New: " patrick at rivosinc dot com
2023-11-17 21:21 ` [Bug target/112598] " patrick at rivosinc dot com
2023-11-21  2:43 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
2023-11-21 13:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 17:43 ` patrick at rivosinc dot com
2023-11-22  6:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-22 11:09 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
2023-11-22 12:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-23  6:02 ` pan2.li at intel dot com
2023-11-24  2:37 ` pan2.li at intel dot com
2023-11-27  3:07 ` pan2.li at intel dot com
2023-11-27  8:15 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-27  8:25 ` pan2.li at intel dot com
2023-11-27  8:43 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-11-27 11:37 ` pan2.li at intel dot com
2023-11-27 12:42 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-27 17:51 ` patrick at rivosinc dot com
2023-11-28  3:15 ` pan2.li at intel dot com
2023-12-04 21:35 ` patrick at rivosinc dot com
2023-12-11 23:48 ` patrick at rivosinc dot com
2024-01-24 23:53 ` patrick at rivosinc dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-112598-4-GlTf8XDN1G@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).