public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gjl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/112830] internal compiler error: in convert_memory_address_addr_space_1, at explow.cc:302
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 19:19:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-112830-4-WbswnfCd2E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-112830-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112830

--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> Is there a valid testcase that has __memx as the destination?  Or is there
> an address space with similar constraints that allows non-const accesses?

No.  The avr backend throws an error when a non-generic address space thing is
not const, like

__memx int var;

int f1 (__memx int *p)
{
    return *p;
}

foo.c:1:12: error: variable 'var' must be const in order to be put into
read-only section by means of '__memx'
    1 | __memx int var;
      |            ^~~
foo.c:3:21: error: pointer targeting address space '__memx' must be const in
function parameter 'p'
    3 | int f1 (__memx int *p)
      |         ~~~~~~~~~~~~^

__memx covers all address spacec, including generic.  But in order to write one
has to cast it to a generic pointer (after checking that it actually points to
generic and not somewhere else (flash)).

(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I think the assert can be relaxed to make truncation OK.

A truncation from 24-bit __memx address to some other AS (all 16 bits) would
require a run-time check which 16-bit AS it encodes, and depending on that
execute code fit for that AS.

This is ok when the user is doing it, but the compiler should never require any
kind of truncation.  And extension / casts are handled by
TARGET_ADDR_SPACE_CONVERT.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-04 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-03 12:22 [Bug middle-end/112830] New: " gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-03 12:37 ` [Bug middle-end/112830] " gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-03 22:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04  7:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04  8:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04  9:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04  9:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04  9:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04 11:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04 19:19 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-12-05  9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-05 10:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-05 11:31 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-05 13:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-05 13:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-05 20:46 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-06  7:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-112830-4-WbswnfCd2E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).