[Bug target/113001] [14 Regression] RISCV Zicond ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 with -O2 rv64gcv_zicond

["cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113001

--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law <law@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10cbfcd60f9e5bdbe486e1c0192e0f168d899b77

commit r14-9341-g10cbfcd60f9e5bdbe486e1c0192e0f168d899b77
Author: Jeff Law <jlaw@ventanamicro.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 6 09:50:44 2024 -0700

    [PR target/113001] Fix incorrect operand swapping in conditional move

    This bug totally fell off my radar.  Sorry about that.

    We have some special casing the conditional move expander to simplify a
    conditional move when comparing a register against zero and that same
register
    is one of the arms.

    Specifically a (eq (reg) (const_int 0)) where reg is also the true arm or
(ne
    (reg) (const_int 0)) where reg is the false arm need not use the fully
    generalized conditional move, thus saving an instruction for those cases.

    In the NE case we swapped the operands, but didn't swap the condition,
which
    led to the ICE due to an unrecognized pattern.  THe backend actually has
    distinct patterns for those two cases.  So swapping the operands is neither
    needed nor advisable.

    Regression tested on rv64gc and verified the new tests pass.

    Pushing to the trunk.

            PR target/113001
            PR target/112871
    gcc/
            * config/riscv/riscv.cc (expand_conditional_move): Do not swap
            operands when the comparison operand is the same as the false
            arm for a NE test.

    gcc/testsuite
            * gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-3.c: New test.
            * gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-4.c: New test.