public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113045] armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf: valgrind error during build of libcc1
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:18:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113045-4-a31Dwmu3EZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113045-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113045
--- Comment #24 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #22)
> Is the optimization still worthwhile some 12 years later ?
Almost certainly. Vector operations have become much better than they were at
the time the patch went in, so it's probably even more worthwhile.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-02 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-16 16:39 [Bug target/113045] New: " dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-16 16:44 ` [Bug target/113045] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 17:35 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-17 18:18 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 18:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 18:50 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-17 18:57 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-17 19:55 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-17 20:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 20:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 21:05 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 22:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 22:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-18 8:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-19 8:23 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-19 8:28 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-19 9:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-19 12:58 ` mark at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-19 16:53 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-19 17:18 ` mark at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 14:40 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 14:49 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 15:05 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2024-01-02 15:14 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-01-02 15:18 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-01-02 16:25 ` mark at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 16:28 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 16:35 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 17:23 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-113045-4-a31Dwmu3EZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).