public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113045] armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf: valgrind error during build of libcc1
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 17:23:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113045-4-wDkLOuKCRZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113045-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113045

--- Comment #28 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> No idea. I know the gcc project is over 30 years old and it is not
> feasible for me to download the entire history, it is too large.
> 
> I have the last 18 months or so history and that's a whopping
> 3.8 Gig on it's own.

$ cd ~/gnusrc/gcc/master/.git
$ du -sh .
1.8G    .

So on my machine the entire git history is just 1.8G; that's because the
history is very densely packed on the server and pulling the entire history
does not require an unpack-repack-send sequence.  

But if you download a partial history, then the git server has to unpack and
then repack the required history in order to send it; that makes the process
much slower and results in far more data being transmitted (the on-the-fly
repack is not as dense because it would take too much time).

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-02 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-16 16:39 [Bug target/113045] New: " dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-16 16:44 ` [Bug target/113045] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 17:35 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-17 18:18 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 18:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 18:50 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-17 18:57 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-17 19:55 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-17 20:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 20:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 21:05 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 22:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 22:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-18  8:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-19  8:23 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-19  8:28 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-19  9:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-19 12:58 ` mark at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-19 16:53 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-12-19 17:18 ` mark at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 14:40 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 14:49 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 15:05 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2024-01-02 15:14 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-01-02 15:18 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 16:25 ` mark at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 16:28 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 16:35 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 17:23 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-113045-4-wDkLOuKCRZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).