public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113159] More robust std::sort for silly comparator functions Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:09:32 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-113159-4-XYBFOMkehZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-113159-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113159 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I haven't seen a proof that libstdc++'s std::sort can't be made more robust without losing performance. Maybe cheap range checks can be done conditionally when _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS is defined, or maybe they'll be cheap enough to do unconditionally. Some work is needed to see what's feasible, but there's no reason to just close the request as INVALID.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 11:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-12-27 23:04 [Bug libstdc++/113159] New: " jengelh at inai dot de 2023-12-28 1:16 ` [Bug libstdc++/113159] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-28 8:46 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-28 18:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-28 18:42 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-29 0:23 ` jengelh at inai dot de 2023-12-29 0:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-29 7:56 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-03 1:41 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-03 11:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-113159-4-XYBFOMkehZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).