public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/113359] [13 Regression] LTO miscompilation of ceph on aarch64
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 19:56:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113359-4-RclJ1lJOkL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113359-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 57061
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57061&action=edit
SloppyCRCMap.ii.xz

When using current GCC trunk instead of current GCC 13 branch (CrtStuff.i.xz is
the same between both), the problematic optimization doesn't happen, both
before SRA and after it the code has
MEM[(struct pair *)_5 + 32B] = MEM[(const struct pair &)__args#0_4(D)];

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-12 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-12 18:31 [Bug tree-optimization/113359] New: " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 18:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113359] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 18:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 18:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 18:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 18:34 ` [Bug ipa/113359] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 19:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 19:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-01-12 20:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15  8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-05 21:48 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06  8:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 10:00 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 12:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 12:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-02-07 17:01 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-19 15:31 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:45 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:45 ` [Bug ipa/113359] [13/14 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 15:02 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 15:13 ` avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 15:25 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 10:42 ` [Bug ipa/113359] [13/14 Regression] LTO miscompilation of ceph on aarch64 and x86_64 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28  8:59 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-04 11:40 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-04 21:22 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 16:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 16:59 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 17:01 ` [Bug ipa/113359] [13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-09  6:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-14 11:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-14 11:58 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-14 12:00 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-17 14:29 ` dkm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-20 15:10 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-20 15:13 ` dkm at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-113359-4-RclJ1lJOkL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).