public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/113359] [13/14 Regression] LTO miscompilation of ceph on aarch64 and x86_64
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 21:22:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113359-4-csnx0s9cs3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113359-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359
--- Comment #24 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #23)
> I however wonder if we really guarantee to copy the paddings everywhere else
> then the total scalarization part?
> (i.e. in all paths through the RTL expansion)
I wanted that we sometimes don't do that in PR 80689 and the idea was
refused. And as far as I can recall the code I don't think we do.
Anyway, I have sent the patch to the mailing list:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ri6jzlc25db.fsf@virgil.suse.cz/T/#u
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-12 18:31 [Bug tree-optimization/113359] New: [13 Regression] LTO miscompilation of ceph on aarch64 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 18:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113359] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 18:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 18:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 18:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 18:34 ` [Bug ipa/113359] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 19:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 19:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 20:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-05 21:48 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 8:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 10:00 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 12:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 12:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-02-07 17:01 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-19 15:31 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:45 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:45 ` [Bug ipa/113359] [13/14 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 15:02 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 15:13 ` avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 15:25 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 10:42 ` [Bug ipa/113359] [13/14 Regression] LTO miscompilation of ceph on aarch64 and x86_64 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28 8:59 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-04 11:40 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-04 21:22 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-04-08 16:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 16:59 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 17:01 ` [Bug ipa/113359] [13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-09 6:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-14 11:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-14 11:58 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-14 12:00 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-17 14:29 ` dkm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-20 15:10 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-20 15:13 ` dkm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-113359-4-csnx0s9cs3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).