public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/113577] New: GCC crashes with co_await expression in
@ 2024-01-24 11:28 usaxena95 at gmail dot com
2024-01-25 10:44 ` [Bug c++/113577] GCC crashes with co_await expression in initialization expression pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: usaxena95 at gmail dot com @ 2024-01-24 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113577
Bug ID: 113577
Summary: GCC crashes with co_await expression in
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: usaxena95 at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Reproducer: https://godbolt.org/z/Pj3bahr8q
```
struct Printy {
Printy(const char *name) : name(name) {
std::cout << "Printy(" << name << ")\n";
}
~Printy() { std::cout << "~Printy(" << name << ")\n"; }
const char *name;
};
struct Awaiter : std::suspend_always {
Printy await_resume() { return Printy(""); }
};
void foo(std::vector<Printy>) {}
coroutine foo() {
foo({Printy("b"),
co_await Awaiter{}});
co_return;
}
```
Crashes with
```
<source>: In function 'coroutine foo()':
<source>:50:1: internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type or
union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in build_special_member_call, at
cp/call.cc:11205
50 | }
| ^
0x2644c5c internal_error(char const*, ...)
???:0
0x963f70 tree_check_failed(tree_node const*, char const*, int, char const*,
...)
???:0
0x16bc17c walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*,
tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*))
???:0
0x16bc17c walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*,
tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*))
???:0
0x16bc17c walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*,
tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*))
???:0
0x16bc17c walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*,
tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*))
???:0
0x16bc392 walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*,
tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*))
???:0
0x16bc17c walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*,
tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*))
???:0
0x16bc17c walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*,
tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, hash_set<tree_node*, false, default_hash_traits<tree_node*> >*))
???:0
0xae3728 morph_fn_to_coro(tree_node*, tree_node**, tree_node**)
???:0
0xb3afbe finish_function(bool)
???:0
0xc52a5a c_parse_file()
???:0
0xda66d9 c_common_parse_file()
???:0
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
Compiler returned: 1
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/113577] GCC crashes with co_await expression in initialization expression
2024-01-24 11:28 [Bug c++/113577] New: GCC crashes with co_await expression in usaxena95 at gmail dot com
@ 2024-01-25 10:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-25 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113577
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup of bug 109227.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 109227 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-25 10:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-24 11:28 [Bug c++/113577] New: GCC crashes with co_await expression in usaxena95 at gmail dot com
2024-01-25 10:44 ` [Bug c++/113577] GCC crashes with co_await expression in initialization expression pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).