public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/113621] New: New test case gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 from r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad fails
@ 2024-01-26 20:06 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 20:33 ` [Bug fortran/113621] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 21:00 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-26 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113621
Bug ID: 113621
Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 from
r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:186ae6d2cb93ad2e07117cff7e11def21fe285ae, r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
dg.exp=gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 -O0 execution test
# of expected passes 11
# of expected passes 12
# of expected passes 23
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected failures 1
This appears to be a problem just on big endian.
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.
Backtrace for this error:
#0 0xf7f803f3 in ???
#1 0x10000c68 in __m_char_MOD_three_val
at
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90:97
#2 0x10001bcb in __m_char_MOD_test_char
at
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90:19
#3 0x1000269b in p
at
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90:218
#4 0x100026f3 in main
at
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90:214
Segmentation fault
commit 186ae6d2cb93ad2e07117cff7e11def21fe285ae (HEAD)
Author: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Wed Jan 24 20:27:36 2024 +0100
Fortran: passing of optional dummies to elemental procedures [PR113377]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/113621] New test case gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 from r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad fails
2024-01-26 20:06 [Bug fortran/113621] New: New test case gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 from r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad fails seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-26 20:33 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 21:00 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-26 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113621
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #0)
> This appears to be a problem just on big endian.
This is only for -m32, right?
> Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory
> reference.
>
> Backtrace for this error:
> #0 0xf7f803f3 in ???
> #1 0x10000c68 in __m_char_MOD_three_val
> at
> /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.
> f90:97
> #2 0x10001bcb in __m_char_MOD_test_char
> at
> /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.
> f90:19
> #3 0x1000269b in p
> at
> /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.
> f90:218
> #4 0x100026f3 in main
> at
> /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.
> f90:214
> Segmentation fault
We likely mishandle the passing-by-value for character(len=4).
There previously was an issue with character(len=1), see pr110419,
fixed by Mikael. This also occurred only on Power big endian for -m32.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/113621] New test case gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 from r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad fails
2024-01-26 20:06 [Bug fortran/113621] New: New test case gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 from r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad fails seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 20:33 ` [Bug fortran/113621] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-26 21:00 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-26 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113621
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I guess the following reduced testcase shows the same crash:
program test
implicit none
character(4) :: c(7) = "*"
call three_val (c)
contains
subroutine three_val (i, j)
character(4), intent(in) :: i(7)
character(4), value, optional :: j
if (present (j)) stop 7
call four (i, j)
call four_val (i, j)
end
elemental subroutine four (i, j)
character(4), intent(in) :: i
character(4), intent(in), optional :: j
if (present (j)) error stop 13
end
elemental subroutine four_val (i, j)
character(4), intent(in) :: i
character(4), value, optional :: j
if (present (j)) error stop 14
end
end
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-26 21:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-26 20:06 [Bug fortran/113621] New: New test case gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 from r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad fails seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 20:33 ` [Bug fortran/113621] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 21:00 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).