public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
@ 2024-02-02 15:39 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-05 8:51 ` [Bug middle-end/113724] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 more replies)
0 siblings, 13 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-02 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
Bug ID: 113724
Summary: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a
struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 57295
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57295&action=edit
compile with: gcc -fopenmp target_struct_map.4
The attached testcase from the OpenMP examples document now ICEs in the
new omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 function.
* * *
target_struct_map.4.c: In function ‘main’:
target_struct_map.4.c:46:11: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
46 | #pragma omp target data map(S1.p[:N],S1.p,S1.a,S1.b)
| ^~~
0x1045382 crash_signal
/home/tburnus/repos/gcc/gcc/toplev.cc:317
0x7fc380e4251f ???
./signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/libc_sigaction.c:0
0xcf8263 tree_check(tree_node*, char const*, int, char const*, tree_code)
/home/tburnus/repos/gcc/gcc/tree.h:3611
0xcf8263 omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
/home/tburnus/repos/gcc/gcc/gimplify.cc:9583
0xd0bc32 omp_gather_mapping_groups
/home/tburnus/repos/gcc/gcc/gimplify.cc:9610
0xd0bc32 gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses
/home/tburnus/repos/gcc/gcc/gimplify.cc:13733
0xd23d27 gimplify_omp_workshare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-05 8:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 12:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-05 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-05 8:51 ` [Bug middle-end/113724] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-06 12:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-07 18:21 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-06 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Debugging shows:
In gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses
(line numbers are off by 1 as I have a #pragma GCC optimize("O0") on top of the
file):
13717 groups = omp_gather_mapping_groups (list_p);
...
13720 if (groups)
13721 {
13722 grpmap = omp_index_mapping_groups (groups);
13723
13724 omp_resolve_clause_dependencies (code, groups, grpmap);
13725 omp_build_struct_sibling_lists (code, ctx->region_type,
groups,
13726 &grpmap, list_p);
On the outermost side:
(gdb) p debug(*list_p)
num_teams(-2) thread_limit(0)
(gdb) p debug(*list_p)
map(tofrom:S1.b) map(tofrom:S1.a) map(tofrom:S1.p) map(tofrom:*S1.p [len: 400])
map(attach_detach:S1.p [bias: 0])
The latter goes into the 'if (groups)' and list_p after line 13726 is:
(gdb) p debug(*list_p)
map(struct:S1 [len: 3]) map(tofrom:S1.a) map(tofrom:S1.b)
The later ICE / segfault is because 'map(struct' has len = 3 but only two map
clauses follow.
And the other question is: Why is 'S1.p' gone?
* * *
The 'struct' (GOMP_MAP_STRUCT) with initial length is created by
omp_accumulate_sibling_list:
11120 OMP_CLAUSE_SET_MAP_KIND (l, str_kind);
11121 OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (l) = unshare_expr (base);
11122 OMP_CLAUSE_SIZE (l) = size_int (1);
and later updated via
11462 OMP_CLAUSE_SIZE (*osc)
11463 = size_binop (PLUS_EXPR, OMP_CLAUSE_SIZE (*osc),
size_one_node);
11464
11465 if (reprocessing_struct)
* * *
This works fine for:
map(tofrom:S1.b)
-> create struct with len=1
It works also for:
map(tofrom:S1.a)
-> update struct len to 2 + add 'S1.a'
But not for:
map(tofrom:S1.p)
-> does update len to 3 but doesn't add 'S1.p'.
I do note that at:
11382 if (attach_detach && sc == grp_start_p)
(gdb) p attach_detach
$139 = true
(gdb) p sc == grp_start_p
$140 = false
(gdb) p debug(*sc)
map(tofrom:S1.b) map(tofrom:S1.p) map(tofrom:*S1.p [len: 400])
map(attach_detach:S1.p [bias: 0])
(gdb) p debug(*grp_start_p)
map(tofrom:*S1.p [len: 400]) map(attach_detach:S1.p [bias: 0])
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-05 8:51 ` [Bug middle-end/113724] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 12:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-07 18:21 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-07 18:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-07 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Inside: omp_build_struct_sibling_lists
new_next
= omp_accumulate_sibling_list (region_type, code,
struct_map_to_clause, *grpmap,
grp_start_p, grp_end, addr_tokens,
&inner, &fragile_p,
grp->reprocess_struct, &added_tail);
This processing looks okay. But:
/* Delete groups marked for deletion above. At this point the order of the
groups may no longer correspond to the order of the underlying list,
which complicates this a little. First clear out OMP_CLAUSE_DECL for
deleted nodes... */
FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (*groups, i, grp)
if (grp->deleted)
for (tree d = *grp->grp_start;
d != OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (grp->grp_end);
d = OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (d))
OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (d) = NULL_TREE;
Where we have the following 4 elements. Note that grp_start is identical for
[1] and [2] – where [2] is deleted = true – which causes that the CLAUSE_DECL
are NULL. Namely, 'p (*groups)[i]' for i = 0...3 gives:
$86 = (omp_mapping_group &) @0x30f7a48: {grp_start = 0x7ffff6c92070, grp_end =
0x7ffff71f96c0, mark = UNVISITED, deleted = false, reprocess_struct = false,
fragile = false, sibling = 0x0, next = 0x0}
$91 = (omp_mapping_group &) @0x30f7a70: {grp_start = 0x7ffff71f96d0, grp_end =
0x7ffff71f9678, mark = UNVISITED, deleted = false, reprocess_struct = false,
fragile = false, sibling = 0x0, next = 0x0}
$92 = (omp_mapping_group &) @0x30f7a98: {grp_start = 0x7ffff71f96d0, grp_end =
0x7ffff71f9630, mark = UNVISITED, deleted = true, reprocess_struct = false,
fragile = false, sibling = 0x0, next = 0x0}
$93 = (omp_mapping_group &) @0x30f7ac0: {grp_start = 0x7ffff71f9640, grp_end =
0x7ffff71f9708, mark = UNVISITED, deleted = false, reprocess_struct = false,
fragile = false, sibling = 0x0, next = 0x0}
Where the '*grp_start' values of [0],[1]+[2], [3] are:
map(struct:S1 [len: 3]) map(tofrom:S1.a) map(tofrom:S1.b) map(alloc:S1.p [len:
8]) map(tofrom:*S1.p [len: 400]) map(attach_detach:S1.p [bias: 0])
map(tofrom:S1.p)
map(alloc:S1.p [len: 8]) map(tofrom:*S1.p [len: 400]) map(attach_detach:S1.p
[bias: 0]) map(tofrom:S1.p)
(gdb) p debug(*(tree*)0x7ffff71f9640)
<nil>
And 'grp_end' for [0]...[4] is:
map(tofrom:S1.b) map(alloc:S1.p [len: 8]) map(tofrom:*S1.p [len: 400])
map(attach_detach:S1.p [bias: 0]) map(tofrom:S1.p)
map(tofrom:S1.a) map(tofrom:S1.b) map(alloc:S1.p [len: 8]) map(tofrom:*S1.p
[len: 400]) map(attach_detach:S1.p [bias: 0]) map(tofrom:S1.p)
map(tofrom:S1.p)
map(attach_detach:S1.p [bias: 0]) map(tofrom:S1.p)
BEFORE that deleted loop, the result is:
(gdb) p debug(*list_p)
map(struct:S1 [len: 3]) map(tofrom:S1.a) map(tofrom:S1.b) map(alloc:S1.p [len:
8]) map(tofrom:*S1.p [len: 400]) map(attach_detach:S1.p [bias: 0])
map(tofrom:S1.p)
which looks fine. Obviously, after the deleted, all entries after 'alloc:S.p'
have CLAUSE_DECL == NULL_TREE, causing the fail.
* * *
RFC:
* Why are there two 'grp' with the same *grp_start value?
* Why does it get set to 'deleted' while its clauses are actually used?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-07 18:21 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-07 18:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-10 11:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-07 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Inside omp_build_struct_sibling_lists, the following assignment:
11654 grp->grp_start = new_next;
has on the LHS the [3] array with value:
(gdb) p *grp
$147 = {grp_start = 0x7ffff71f9688, grp_end = 0x7ffff71f9630, mark = UNVISITED,
deleted = true, reprocess_struct = false, fragile = false, sibling = 0x0, next
= 0x0}
while
(gdb) p new_next
$146 = (tree *) 0x7ffff71f96d0
which causes the alias issue we are seeing. Before the assignment:
(gdb) p debug(*(tree*)0x7ffff71f9688)
map(tofrom:S1.b) map(tofrom:S1.p) map(tofrom:*S1.p [len: 400])
map(attach_detach:S1.p [bias: 0])
(gdb) p debug(*(tree*)0x7ffff71f96d0)
map(tofrom:S1.p) map(tofrom:*S1.p [len: 400]) map(attach_detach:S1.p [bias: 0])
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-07 18:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-10 11:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-10 18:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-10 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 57377
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57377&action=edit
Fixes the ICE – might paper over a real issue; doesn't fix the run-time issue →
TODO + 'data'-issue in PR comment 4
The patch fixes the issue
#pragma omp target data map(S1.p[:N],S1.p,S1.a,S1.b)
This gets split into the groups (reverse order!) 'S1.b' (i = 0), 'S1.a' (i =
1), 'S1.p' (i = 3) and 'S1.p[:N]' (i = 4; map + attach).
In omp_build_struct_sibling_lists the collecting and reordering happens but for
'S1.p' there should be an 'alloc' not a 'tofrom' - such 'S1.p' has grp->deleted
and the attach code will add the 'alloc' code.
Until i = 2, everything is fine:
*(*group[2])->deleted == true
*(*group[2])->grp_start == (*group[2])->grp_end
and this encloses 'map(tofrom:S1.p [len: 8])' – which should be removed in
favor of a later (i = 3) added 'map(alloc:S1.p [len: 8])'.
In principle, everything looks fine, until i =3 calls
omp_accumulate_sibling_list, which in turn calls:
continue_at
= cl ? omp_siblist_move_concat_nodes_after (cl, tail_chain,
grp_start_p, grp_end,
sc)
: omp_siblist_move_nodes_after (grp_start_p, grp_end, sc);
where 'cl' != NULL_TREE.
After the call, 'tail_chain' alias 'list_p' looks fine - except for the tailing
'map(tofrom:S1.p [len: 8])'.
In principle, 'groups' is no longer touched - except for the the 'grp->deleted'
handling, which fails (deletes the wrong stuff) because grp_begin points to the
wrong tree.
Solution: Do the OMP_CLAUSE_DECL nullifying earlier such that messing around
with groups won't cause issues.
TODO: We should really find out WHY i=2's grp_begin gets updated. If it happens
just for previously processed grp items, that's fine - but what will happen if
it also affects a still to be processed item? - If that indeed happens,
everything will be messed up again!
* * *
The testcase shows another issue:
target data map(to: S2.p[:N])
gets mapped as:
map(struct:S2 [len: 1]) map(alloc:S2.p [len: 0])
map(tofrom:*_14 [len: 400]) map(attach:S2.p [bias: 0])
before:
map(tofrom:*_14 [len: 400]) map(attach:S2.p [bias: 0]
The problem of the former is of course that 'S' is already partially mapped and
that an alloc of length 0 will then fail already in 'target data' for the
attach:S2.p as 0 bytes aren't sufficient for a pointer attachment.
This applies both to target data and target, except that for 'target', 'S'
might appear implicitly - while for 'data' it can only appear explicitly or not
at all.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-10 11:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-10 18:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 10:40 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-10 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The runtime issue is now PR113867.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-10 18:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-13 10:40 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 20:42 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-13 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 57407
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57407&action=edit
C testcase – passes with patch (except for '#if 0'ed PR113867 issues)
DejaGNU-ified testcase for this PR and ('#if 0'-ed for PR113867).
Using the attached patch, it no longer gives an ICE and it works except for the
'#if 0' code but it regresses for:
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/baseptrs-1.c (internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault)
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/baseptrs-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/pr109062.c output pattern test
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/target-map-1.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/target-52.c execution test
Thus, there is more work needed.
TODO:
- Create a tix which solves this issue without regressing
- Possibly addressing the PR113867 here
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-13 10:40 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-07 20:42 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 10:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: law at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-07 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority|P3 |P1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-07 20:42 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-26 10:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 10:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-26 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |13.2.1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-26
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed btw., works with checking-enabled GCC 13.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-26 10:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-26 10:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-18 15:23 ` [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 since r14-6515 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-26 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
With release checking we ICE with
t.c: In function 'main':
t.c:46:11: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
46 | #pragma omp target data map(S1.p[:N],S1.p,S1.a,S1.b)
| ^~~
0xd320af crash_signal
/home/rguenther/src/trunk/gcc/toplev.cc:319
0xa3b5b0 omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
/home/rguenther/src/trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:9593
0xa3b769 omp_gather_mapping_groups
/home/rguenther/src/trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:9621
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 since r14-6515
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-26 10:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-04-18 15:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-26 8:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-07 7:44 ` [Bug middle-end/113724] [14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-18 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE |[14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE
|(segfault) when mapping a |(segfault) when mapping a
|struct in |struct in
|omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 |omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
| |since r14-6515
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
ICE started with r14-6515-g5fdb150cd4bf8f2da335e3f5c3a17aafcbc66dbe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 since r14-6515
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-18 15:23 ` [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 since r14-6515 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-04-26 8:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-07 7:44 ` [Bug middle-end/113724] [14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-26 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Per IRC discussions downgrading this to P2, it isn't something used widely in
real-world code and while we can get some partial fix soon, a full fix will
take likely longer. If it is fixed relatively soon in stage1, we can consider
backporting the non-risky parts of the fixes to 14.2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/113724] [14/15 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 since r14-6515
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-26 8:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-05-07 7:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-07 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|14.0 |14.2
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 14.1 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 14.2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-07 7:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-02 15:39 [Bug middle-end/113724] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-05 8:51 ` [Bug middle-end/113724] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 12:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-07 18:21 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-07 18:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-10 11:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-10 18:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 10:40 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 20:42 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 10:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 10:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-18 15:23 ` [Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 since r14-6515 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-26 8:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-07 7:44 ` [Bug middle-end/113724] [14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).