public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/114042] New: diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg()
@ 2024-02-22  5:32 zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2024-02-22  7:25 ` [Bug c/114042] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: zsojka at seznam dot cz @ 2024-02-22  5:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114042

            Bug ID: 114042
           Summary: diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions
                    __builtin_clzg()
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: diagnostic
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: zsojka at seznam dot cz
  Target Milestone: ---
              Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
            Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Created attachment 57487
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57487&action=edit
reduced testcase

Compiler output:
$ gcc-14 bc.c 
bc.c: In function ‘foo’:
bc.c:4:36: error: argument 1 in call to function ‘__builtin_clzg’ has signed
type
    4 |     return __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil(i);
      |                                    ^


but it should talk about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil()

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/114042] diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg()
  2024-02-22  5:32 [Bug c/114042] New: diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg() zsojka at seznam dot cz
@ 2024-02-22  7:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-02-22  8:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-22  7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114042

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-02-22
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/114042] diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg()
  2024-02-22  5:32 [Bug c/114042] New: diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg() zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2024-02-22  7:25 ` [Bug c/114042] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-22  8:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-02-22  8:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-22  8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114042

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No idea how we could do that, __builtin_stdc_bit* is intentionally lowered very
early, so the diagnostics doesn't know it is not __builtin_clzg.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/114042] diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg()
  2024-02-22  5:32 [Bug c/114042] New: diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg() zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2024-02-22  7:25 ` [Bug c/114042] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-02-22  8:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-22  8:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-02-22 17:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-22  8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114042

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sure, we could repeat some of the checks we do for __builtin_clzg etc. before
we lower __builtin_stdc_*, but wouldn't that be a maintainance nightmare?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/114042] diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg()
  2024-02-22  5:32 [Bug c/114042] New: diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg() zsojka at seznam dot cz
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-02-22  8:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-22 17:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-02-26 15:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-02-26 15:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-22 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114042

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 57502
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57502&action=edit
gcc14-pr114042.patch

Actually it isn't that bad.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/114042] diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg()
  2024-02-22  5:32 [Bug c/114042] New: diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg() zsojka at seznam dot cz
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-02-22 17:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-26 15:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-02-26 15:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-26 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114042

--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77576915cfd26e603aba5295dfdac54a5545f5f2

commit r14-9184-g77576915cfd26e603aba5295dfdac54a5545f5f2
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Feb 26 16:30:16 2024 +0100

    c: Improve some diagnostics for __builtin_stdc_bit_* [PR114042]

    The PR complains that for the __builtin_stdc_bit_* "builtins" the
    diagnostics doesn't mention the name of the builtin the user used, but
    instead __builtin_{clz,ctz,popcount}g instead (which is what the FE
    immediately lowers it to).

    The following patch repeats the checks from
check_builtin_function_arguments
    which are there done on BUILT_IN_{CLZ,CTZ,POPCOUNT}G, such that they
    diagnose it with the name of the "builtin" user actually used before it
    is gone.

    2024-02-26  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR c/114042
            * c-parser.cc (c_parser_postfix_expression): Diagnose
            __builtin_stdc_bit_* argument with ENUMERAL_TYPE or BOOLEAN_TYPE
            type or if signed here rather than on the replacement builtins
            in check_builtin_function_arguments.

            * gcc.dg/builtin-stdc-bit-2.c: Adjust testcase for actual builtin
            names rather than names of builtin replacements.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/114042] diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg()
  2024-02-22  5:32 [Bug c/114042] New: diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg() zsojka at seznam dot cz
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-02-26 15:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-26 15:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-26 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114042

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-26 15:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-22  5:32 [Bug c/114042] New: diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg() zsojka at seznam dot cz
2024-02-22  7:25 ` [Bug c/114042] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22  8:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22  8:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 17:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-26 15:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-26 15:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).