public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/114236] New: introduce unnecessary store operation when unrolling a loop
@ 2024-03-05 11:54 absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn
2024-03-05 15:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114236] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn @ 2024-03-05 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114236
Bug ID: 114236
Summary: introduce unnecessary store operation when unrolling a
loop
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn
Target Milestone: ---
here's the code, compiled with gcc-13.2.0 -O2
```
// https://godbolt.org/z/5xWrr44hn
short g_16[2][1] = {{(-8L)},{(-8L)}};
int g_22 = (-1L);
int g_71 = 0xA62A9801L;
int *g_70 = &g_71;
int c;
void func_1() {
int d;
for (; c;)
;
for (d = -1; d < 17; d++) {
short *e = g_16[0];
*g_70 = *e = g_22;
}
}
```
```
func_1():
401440: mov 0x10762(%rip),%eax # 411ba8 <c>
401446: test %eax,%eax
401448: je 401450 <func_1+0x10>
40144a: jmp 40144a <func_1+0xa>
40144c: nopl 0x0(%rax)
401450: mov 0x2c09(%rip),%rsi # 404060 <g_70>
401457: mov $0x12,%eax
40145c: nopl 0x0(%rax)
401460: mov 0x2c06(%rip),%ecx # 40406c <g_22>
401466: movswl %cx,%edx
401469: mov %edx,(%rsi)
40146b: sub $0x1,%eax
40146e: jne 401460 <func_1+0x20>
401470: mov %cx,0x2bf9(%rip) # 404070 <g_16>
401477: mov %edx,(%rsi)
```
we can see that the store operation at 0x401477 is unnecessary and lead to 19
times memory write, more one time than the loop.
And I found this behavior showing up from the `141t.lim2` file when I check the
output files of `-fdump-tree-all`.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/114236] introduce unnecessary store operation when unrolling a loop
2024-03-05 11:54 [Bug tree-optimization/114236] New: introduce unnecessary store operation when unrolling a loop absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn
@ 2024-03-05 15:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-05 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114236
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Executing store motion of MEM[(short int *)&g_16] from loop 2
Re-issueing dependent store of *g_70.2_4 from loop 2 on exit 4 -> 5
Moving statement
The extra store is required to enable sinking of the store to g_16 as
we don't know whether g_70 points to aliased memory.
I think we fail to realize that *g_70 is loop invariant as well, but
what you observe is a feature - it allows reducing the number of stores
to g_16.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-05 15:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-05 11:54 [Bug tree-optimization/114236] New: introduce unnecessary store operation when unrolling a loop absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn
2024-03-05 15:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114236] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).