public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/114555] New: ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield
@ 2024-04-02  7:24 zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2024-04-03 11:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114555] " zsojka at seznam dot cz
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: zsojka at seznam dot cz @ 2024-04-02  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114555

            Bug ID: 114555
           Summary: ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in
                    block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: zsojka at seznam dot cz
                CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---
              Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
            Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Created attachment 57843
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57843&action=edit
reduced testcase

Compiler output:
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O testcase.c 
testcase.c: In function 'foo':
testcase.c:10:1: error: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block
15
   10 | foo (void)
      | ^~~
for SSA_NAME: _15 in statement:
_14 = PHI <_13(2), _15(15)>
PHI argument
_15
for PHI node
_14 = PHI <_13(2), _15(15)>
during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower
testcase.c:10:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
0x17913a0 verify_ssa(bool, bool)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa.cc:1203
0x13d19e5 execute_function_todo
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/passes.cc:2095
0x13d1e4e execute_todo
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/passes.cc:2142
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.

$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-latest-amd64/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-trunk-r14-9731-20240331183750-gb313baba57f-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/14.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /repo/gcc-trunk//configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-valgrind-annotations --disable-nls --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df,extra
--with-cloog --with-ppl --with-isl --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --enable-libsanitizer
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-9731-20240331183750-gb313baba57f-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.1 20240331 (experimental) (GCC)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/114555] ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield
  2024-04-02  7:24 [Bug tree-optimization/114555] New: ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield zsojka at seznam dot cz
@ 2024-04-03 11:26 ` zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2024-04-03 13:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: zsojka at seznam dot cz @ 2024-04-03 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114555

--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka <zsojka at seznam dot cz> ---
Created attachment 57860
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57860&action=edit
another testcase, failing with -O -fno-tree-forwprop

Compiler output:
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O -fno-tree-forwprop testcase2.c 
testcase2.c: In function 'foo':
testcase2.c:9:1: error: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block
15
    9 | foo(void)
      | ^~~
for SSA_NAME: _17 in statement:
_16 = PHI <_15(2), _17(15)>
PHI argument
_17
for PHI node
_16 = PHI <_15(2), _17(15)>
during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower
testcase2.c:9:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
0x177b02f verify_ssa(bool, bool)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa.cc:1203
0x13cc2c5 execute_function_todo
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/passes.cc:2095
0x13cc72e execute_todo
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/passes.cc:2142
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/114555] ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield
  2024-04-02  7:24 [Bug tree-optimization/114555] New: ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2024-04-03 11:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114555] " zsojka at seznam dot cz
@ 2024-04-03 13:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-04-04  8:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-04-04  9:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-03 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114555

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-04-03
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 57862
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57862&action=edit
gcc14-pr114555.patch

So far lightly tested patch.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/114555] ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield
  2024-04-02  7:24 [Bug tree-optimization/114555] New: ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2024-04-03 11:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114555] " zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2024-04-03 13:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-04-04  8:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-04-04  9:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-04  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114555

--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48530efdcccb154d3ed200246384edc162debc5d

commit r14-9783-g48530efdcccb154d3ed200246384edc162debc5d
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 4 10:47:00 2024 +0200

    bitint: Handle m_bitfld_load cast in outer m_cast_conditional [PR114555]

    We ICE on the following testcase, because we use result of a PHI node
    which is only conditional because of a m_cast_conditional on the outermost
    loops PHI node argument and so is invalid SSA form.

    The following patch fixes it like similar cases elsewhere by adding
    needed intervening PHI(s).

    2024-04-04  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR tree-optimization/114555
            * gimple-lower-bitint.cc (bitint_large_huge::handle_cast): For
            m_bitfld_load and save_cast_conditional add any needed PHIs
            and adjust t4 accordingly.

            * gcc.dg/bitint-103.c: New test.
            * gcc.dg/bitint-104.c: New test.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/114555] ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield
  2024-04-02  7:24 [Bug tree-optimization/114555] New: ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield zsojka at seznam dot cz
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-04-04  8:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-04-04  9:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-04  9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114555

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-04  9:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-02  7:24 [Bug tree-optimization/114555] New: ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield zsojka at seznam dot cz
2024-04-03 11:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114555] " zsojka at seznam dot cz
2024-04-03 13:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-04  8:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-04  9:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).