public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-09-24 7:41 ` antoshkka at gmail dot com
2022-11-02 15:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: antoshkka at gmail dot com @ 2021-09-24 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
--- Comment #10 from Antony Polukhin <antoshkka at gmail dot com> ---
Any progress?
Multiple compilers already eliminate the atexit call. Moreover, some of the
compilers even eliminate the guard variable after that
https://godbolt.org/z/dbdfMrroa
Note that the atexit elimination would benefit the libstdc++, as the latter now
uses a bunch of constant_init instances that have empty destructor
in libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/memory_resource.cc and
libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/system_error.cc . It would be possible to eliminate the
atexit calls for those cases and speedup startup times
https://godbolt.org/z/MKaWKevzq
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-09-24 7:41 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors antoshkka at gmail dot com
@ 2022-11-02 15:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-02 15:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-02 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rdiezmail-gcc at yahoo dot de
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 107500 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-09-24 7:41 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors antoshkka at gmail dot com
2022-11-02 15:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-02 15:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-02 17:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-02 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2006-02-05 21:10:26 |2022-11-2
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reduced from the code in libstdc++:
extern "C" int puts(const char*);
struct A
{
constexpr A() { }
~A() { puts("bye"); }
};
namespace
{
struct constant_init
{
union {
A obj;
};
constexpr constant_init() : obj() { }
~constant_init() { /* do nothing, union member is not destroyed */ }
};
// Single-threaded fallback buffer.
constinit constant_init global;
}
extern "C" A* get() { return &global.obj; }
With -std=c++20 -Os GCC emits a call to atexit:
(anonymous namespace)::constant_init::~constant_init() [base object
destructor]:
ret
get:
mov eax, OFFSET FLAT:_ZN12_GLOBAL__N_16globalE
ret
_GLOBAL__sub_I_get:
mov edx, OFFSET FLAT:__dso_handle
mov esi, OFFSET FLAT:_ZN12_GLOBAL__N_16globalE
mov edi, OFFSET FLAT:_ZN12_GLOBAL__N_113constant_initD1Ev
jmp __cxa_atexit
With the same options, Clang doesn't:
get: # @get
lea rax, [rip + (anonymous namespace)::global]
ret
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-02 15:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-02 17:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 22:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-02 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 107500 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-02 17:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-15 22:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-15 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I am testing a (small) patch for this. Basically DCE can remove the calls to
__cxa_atexit .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-15 22:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-15 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-16 2:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-15 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The patch is able to handle all 3 testcases here even:
For the libstdc++ one:
t3.cc.123t.dce2:Deleting : __cxxabiv1::__cxa_atexit (__dt_comp , &global,
&__dso_handle);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-15 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-16 2:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-16 22:47 ` i at maskray dot me
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-16 2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So what is interesting is the way LLVM implements this as an IPO pass as how I
described in comment #8, 6 years after I wrote that. Well they used "empty"
rather than const . Note using it as an IPO pass I think is not wrong just
having a specialized pass here where this is the same as DCE so just have DCE
handle it instead seems better; plus with the availability of having pure/const
flags with LTO and not having to load in the function seems much better really.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-16 2:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-16 22:47 ` i at maskray dot me
2024-04-19 0:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: i at maskray dot me @ 2024-03-16 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
Fangrui Song <i at maskray dot me> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #17 from Fangrui Song <i at maskray dot me> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> So what is interesting is the way LLVM implements this as an IPO pass as how
> I described in comment #8, 6 years after I wrote that. Well they used
> "empty" rather than const . Note using it as an IPO pass I think is not
> wrong just having a specialized pass here where this is the same as DCE so
> just have DCE handle it instead seems better; plus with the availability of
> having pure/const flags with LTO and not having to load in the function
> seems much better really.
Yes, LLVM recognizes __cxa_atexit as a library function and removes it in
GlobalOpt (part of IPO) since 2011
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ee6bc70d2f1c2434ca9ca8092216bdeab322c7e5),
likely because
GlobalOpt is already doing global variable optimizations (e.g. removal if dead,
constant folding). Technically __cxa_atexit removal can be moved elsewhere.
There are two GlobalOpt passes in the optimization pipeline (see -mllvm
-print-changed=cdiff output), one before the inliner and one after.
SROA
...
GlobalOpt
...
buildInlinerPipeline
...
GlobalOpt
For empty functions like `~constant_init() {}`, SROA deletes unneeded IR
instructions (spill of the "this" pointer) and actually makes the IR function
empty. Then GlobalOpt removes __cxa_atexit call sites.
For `static void empty() {} ~constant_init() { empty(); }`, the inliner removes
the `empty()` and makes the IR function empty. Then GlobalOpt removes
__cxa_atexit call sites.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-16 22:47 ` i at maskray dot me
@ 2024-04-19 0:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-19 0:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-19 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 57987
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57987&action=edit
Patch which I will be submitting once GCC 15 stage 1 opens up
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-19 0:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-04-19 0:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-07 21:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-07 21:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-19 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18)
> Created attachment 57987 [details]
> Patch which I will be submitting once GCC 15 stage 1 opens up
I forgot to add the testcase from comment #12. the patch which I am going to
submit will have it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-19 0:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-05-07 21:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-07 21:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-07 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9dd853680b12d9c9def5de61abde5d057c526ba
commit r15-308-gc9dd853680b12d9c9def5de61abde5d057c526ba
Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri Mar 15 16:34:22 2024 -0700
DCE __cxa_atexit calls where the function is pure/const [PR19661]
In C++ sometimes you have a deconstructor function which is "empty", like
for an
example with unions or with arrays. The front-end might not know it is
empty either
so this should be done on during optimization.o
To implement it I added it to DCE where we mark if a statement is necessary
or not.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
Changes since v1:
* v2: Add support for __aeabi_atexit for arm-*eabi. Add extra comments.
Add cxa_atexit-5.C testcase for -fPIC case.
* v3: Fix testcases for the __aeabi_atexit (forgot to do in the v2).
PR tree-optimization/19661
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-ssa-dce.cc (is_cxa_atexit): New function.
(is_removable_cxa_atexit_call): New function.
(mark_stmt_if_obviously_necessary): Don't mark removable
cxa_at_exit calls.
(mark_all_reaching_defs_necessary_1): Likewise.
(propagate_necessity): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/cxa_atexit-1.C: New test.
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/cxa_atexit-2.C: New test.
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/cxa_atexit-3.C: New test.
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/cxa_atexit-4.C: New test.
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/cxa_atexit-5.C: New test.
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/cxa_atexit-6.C: New test.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-07 21:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-05-07 21:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-07 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
[not found] <bug-19661-6649@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2008-02-20 21:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-20 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 21:52 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Why do you think the front-end doesn't know that the destructor is empty?
Because it is non trivial. Try it with a more complex case where you have
multiple layer destructors and inlining, you will see that the front-end does
not know if it is empty until way after inlining.
-- Pinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors
2005-01-27 22:24 [Bug c++/19661] New: many redundant atexit calls emitted into the executable " yuri at tsoft dot com
@ 2005-09-24 17:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-24 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-24 17:42 -------
Hmm, the easy way to to have a pass which finds all the atexit calls and sees if the function which is
passed is a const function and if it is, then just remove the atexit call.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-07 21:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-19661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-09-24 7:41 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors antoshkka at gmail dot com
2022-11-02 15:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-02 15:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-02 17:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 22:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-16 2:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-16 22:47 ` i at maskray dot me
2024-04-19 0:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-19 0:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-07 21:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-07 21:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
[not found] <bug-19661-6649@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2008-02-20 21:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 22:24 [Bug c++/19661] New: many redundant atexit calls emitted into the executable " yuri at tsoft dot com
2005-09-24 17:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).