public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*
[not found] <bug-19799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-01-29 23:19 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-29 23:52 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2024-02-16 5:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-29 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-29 23:05:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The stub placement issues in GNU ld still haven't been fixed.
Is there a binutils bugzilla entry for this? Perhaps the issue is fixed now?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*
[not found] <bug-19799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-29 23:19 ` [Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux* steven at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-29 23:52 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2024-02-16 5:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2012-01-29 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-29 23:23:56 UTC ---
On 29-Jan-12, at 6:05 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
>
> Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |steven at gcc dot
> gnu.org
>
> --- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org>
> 2012-01-29 23:05:41 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #4)
>> The stub placement issues in GNU ld still haven't been fixed.
>
> Is there a binutils bugzilla entry for this? Perhaps the issue is
> fixed now?
64-bit GNU ld still doesn't support stub placement on hppa. I spent
some time a couple of years
ago working on elf64-hppa.c to make the code similar to elf32-hppa.c.
Probably, the two could
be merged and in the process stub support could be added to the 64-bit
code.
My time is limited...
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*
[not found] <bug-19799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-29 23:19 ` [Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux* steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-29 23:52 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2024-02-16 5:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-16 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |testsuite-fail, xfail
Last reconfirmed|2006-01-15 20:40:09 |2024-2-15
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
hppa*64*-*-* is still there.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*
2005-02-07 6:32 [Bug rtl-optimization/19799] New: sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c fail " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-09 12:41 ` [Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-10 10:51 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-10 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Severity|enhancement |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*
2005-02-07 6:32 [Bug rtl-optimization/19799] New: sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c fail " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-09 12:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-10 10:51 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-09 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 06:41 -------
The testcase is now xfailed but now it is missed optimization so suspending untill binutils is fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Summary|sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c |sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c
|fail on hppa64-*-hpux* |xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-16 5:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-19799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-29 23:19 ` [Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux* steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-29 23:52 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2024-02-16 5:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2005-02-07 6:32 [Bug rtl-optimization/19799] New: sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c fail " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-09 12:41 ` [Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-10 10:51 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).