public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:15:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-26854-4-XPS5LVkOsV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-26854-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854 --- Comment #123 from Daniel Berlin <dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-18 14:54:33 UTC --- On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:49 AM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854 > > Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #122 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-18 14:48:32 UTC --- > oprofiling shows that 50% of parsing time is in decl_jump_unsafe that is C > frontend thingy to output some sort of warnings on gotos to VLAs. This can > probably be solved quite easilly. > > Later we get (at -O2 all.i) > 83417 17.0179 cc1 dominated_by_p > 75164 15.3342 cc1 bitmap_equal_p > 38134 7.7797 cc1 bitmap_set_bit > 26144 5.3336 cc1 bitmap_ior_into > 21031 4.2905 cc1 decl_jump_unsafe > 16142 3.2931 cc1 register_new_assert_for.isra.42 > 12713 2.5936 cc1 bitmap_elt_insert_after > 11136 2.2719 cc1 sbitmap_a_or_b > 10625 2.1676 cc1 et_splay > 10059 2.0521 cc1 walk_dominator_tree > 6775 1.3822 cc1 dse_enter_block > 5952 1.2143 cc1 bitmap_bit_p This looks suspiciously like it's not using the DFS numbers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-18 14:55 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-26854-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-01-18 14:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 15:08 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 15:15 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2011-01-18 15:51 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-18 15:53 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-24 23:03 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-24 23:47 ` ian at airs dot com 2011-02-02 17:54 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-04 9:59 ` bonzini at gnu dot org 2021-12-17 7:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-17 20:21 ` lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2021-12-17 20:24 ` lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2022-01-03 10:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-06 12:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-07 13:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-07 22:23 ` lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2023-02-08 21:53 ` lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2023-02-09 7:24 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-09 7:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-09 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-13 14:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-15 14:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2006-03-24 20:25 [Bug c/26854] New: " lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-03-25 16:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/26854] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-25 22:22 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-04-19 6:43 ` law at redhat dot com 2006-04-19 15:32 ` law at redhat dot com 2006-04-19 22:34 ` law at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 3:18 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-04-20 3:28 ` law at redhat dot com 2006-04-20 3:39 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-04-20 16:13 ` law at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 16:17 ` law at redhat dot com 2006-04-20 16:21 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 18:59 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-04-27 2:29 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-04-27 2:30 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-04-27 20:22 ` amacleod at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-30 4:36 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-11-30 4:54 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org 2006-12-07 17:33 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-12-07 17:54 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org 2006-12-07 17:54 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org 2006-12-07 21:51 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-12-08 1:24 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-12-11 6:28 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2007-01-10 18:49 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2007-01-10 19:48 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2007-11-14 9:56 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-14 10:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-14 12:04 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-14 12:40 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2007-11-14 13:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-14 13:38 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2007-11-14 14:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-14 16:57 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org 2007-11-14 19:05 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2007-11-14 19:06 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2007-12-19 21:49 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2007-12-19 22:13 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-19 23:31 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2007-12-20 0:02 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-20 2:29 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2007-12-20 3:07 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-12-20 3:52 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2007-12-20 14:49 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-12-20 15:08 ` stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com 2007-12-20 15:31 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-12-20 16:06 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-12-20 16:11 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2007-12-20 17:28 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-12-20 18:56 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-01-17 21:41 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-01-17 21:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 22:07 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-01-17 22:20 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-01-17 22:54 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-01-17 23:58 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-01-18 1:46 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-01-18 2:18 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-01-19 0:51 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 2:21 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 13:59 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-23 15:45 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-05-15 2:49 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-05-15 2:51 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-05-15 2:52 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-05-15 5:59 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-19 2:00 ` vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-05-19 2:04 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-19 2:09 ` vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-05-19 17:55 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-07-10 17:37 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-07-10 17:45 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-07-10 19:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-10 19:40 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-09-10 13:40 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-26854-4-XPS5LVkOsV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).