public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 10:48:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-26854-4-kOh4oib1wL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-26854-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
| |uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #142 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
machine dep reorg :1240.75 ( 56%) 0.31 ( 1%)1241.63 ( 55%)
0 ( 0%)
humm. Might be triggered by us vectorizing at -O2 now (this is compiler.i).
Might be worth splitting out this issue.
all3 also has
machine dep reorg : 180.41 ( 31%) 0.05 ( 0%) 180.52 ( 31%)
0 ( 0%)
while _num3 is at only 13%. Maybe we're going crazy with DF (updates) there
again ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-03 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-26854-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-01-18 14:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-18 15:08 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-18 15:15 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-18 15:51 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2011-01-18 15:53 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-24 23:03 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-24 23:47 ` ian at airs dot com
2011-02-02 17:54 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-04 9:59 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2021-12-17 7:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-17 20:21 ` lucier at math dot purdue.edu
2021-12-17 20:24 ` lucier at math dot purdue.edu
2022-01-03 10:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-02-06 12:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-07 13:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-07 22:23 ` lucier at math dot purdue.edu
2023-02-08 21:53 ` lucier at math dot purdue.edu
2023-02-09 7:24 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-09 7:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-09 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-13 14:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-15 14:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2006-03-24 20:25 [Bug c/26854] New: " lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2006-03-25 16:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/26854] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-25 22:22 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2006-04-19 6:43 ` law at redhat dot com
2006-04-19 15:32 ` law at redhat dot com
2006-04-19 22:34 ` law at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-20 3:18 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2006-04-20 3:28 ` law at redhat dot com
2006-04-20 3:39 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2006-04-20 16:13 ` law at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-20 16:17 ` law at redhat dot com
2006-04-20 16:21 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-26 18:59 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2006-04-27 2:29 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2006-04-27 2:30 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2006-04-27 20:22 ` amacleod at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-30 4:36 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2006-11-30 4:54 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2006-12-07 17:33 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2006-12-07 17:54 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2006-12-07 17:54 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2006-12-07 21:51 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2006-12-08 1:24 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2006-12-11 6:28 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2007-01-10 18:49 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2007-01-10 19:48 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2007-11-14 9:56 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-14 10:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-14 12:04 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-14 12:40 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2007-11-14 13:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-14 13:38 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2007-11-14 14:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-14 16:57 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2007-11-14 19:05 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2007-11-14 19:06 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2007-12-19 21:49 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2007-12-19 22:13 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-19 23:31 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2007-12-20 0:02 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-20 2:29 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2007-12-20 3:07 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-20 3:52 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2007-12-20 14:49 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-20 15:08 ` stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com
2007-12-20 15:31 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-20 16:06 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-20 16:11 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2007-12-20 17:28 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-20 18:56 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2008-01-17 21:41 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-01-17 21:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-17 22:07 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-01-17 22:20 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2008-01-17 22:54 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2008-01-17 23:58 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-01-18 1:46 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2008-01-18 2:18 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-01-19 0:51 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-20 2:21 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-22 13:59 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-23 15:45 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2008-05-15 2:49 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2008-05-15 2:51 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2008-05-15 2:52 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2008-05-15 5:59 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 2:00 ` vmakarov at redhat dot com
2008-05-19 2:04 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 2:09 ` vmakarov at redhat dot com
2008-05-19 17:55 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2008-07-10 17:37 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2008-07-10 17:45 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
2008-07-10 19:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-10 19:40 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-09-10 13:40 ` lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-26854-4-kOh4oib1wL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).