public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug preprocessor/28388] stringify (#) operator broken
[not found] <bug-28388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2023-02-06 12:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-06 12:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-02-06 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #6)
> The infinite loop is still present in GCC 4.3 with
>
> #define A(b) #b
> A(\ \\)
This now seems to work. I can confirm the issue with GCC 4.3 but GCC 7
already does
t.c:2:7: warning: invalid string literal, ignoring final '\'
A(\ \\)
^
t.c:2:7: warning: unknown escape sequence: '\040'
t.c:2:7: error: expected identifier or '(' before string constant
A(\ \\)
^
t.c:1:15: note: in definition of macro 'A'
#define A(b) #b
^
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/28388] stringify (#) operator broken
[not found] <bug-28388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2023-02-06 12:19 ` [Bug preprocessor/28388] stringify (#) operator broken rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-02-06 12:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-02-06 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
r239175 seemed to fix it: "On-demand locations within string-literals"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/28388] stringify (#) operator broken
2006-07-15 5:17 [Bug preprocessor/28388] New: " sabre at nondot dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-15 5:26 ` sabre at nondot dot org
@ 2007-10-29 19:49 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-29 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-29 19:48 -------
The infinite loop is still present in GCC 4.3 with
#define A(b) #b
A(\ \\)
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-10-29 19:48:58
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/28388] stringify (#) operator broken
2006-07-15 5:17 [Bug preprocessor/28388] New: " sabre at nondot dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-15 5:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-15 5:26 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2007-10-29 19:49 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: sabre at nondot dot org @ 2006-07-15 5:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from sabre at nondot dot org 2006-07-15 05:26 -------
Okay, I don't care who does or doesn't do it. :) It doesn't get diagnosed in
-E mode, though it's in clear violation of C99 6.10.3.2p2.
-Chris
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/28388] stringify (#) operator broken
2006-07-15 5:17 [Bug preprocessor/28388] New: " sabre at nondot dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-15 5:23 ` sabre at nondot dot org
@ 2006-07-15 5:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-15 5:26 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2007-10-29 19:49 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-15 5:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-15 05:25 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Right, but that is presumably the parser, not the preprocessor doing it... so
> it is a bug in the preprocessor.
Nope, that is the preprocessor doing it, you will notice the column field which
tells you that it is the preprocessor.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/28388] stringify (#) operator broken
2006-07-15 5:17 [Bug preprocessor/28388] New: " sabre at nondot dot org
2006-07-15 5:21 ` [Bug preprocessor/28388] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-15 5:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-15 5:23 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2006-07-15 5:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: sabre at nondot dot org @ 2006-07-15 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from sabre at nondot dot org 2006-07-15 05:23 -------
> Also without -E, we do warn about the second one:
> t.c:2:7: warning: unknown escape sequence '\`'
Right, but that is presumably the parser, not the preprocessor doing it... so
it is a bug in the preprocessor.
-Chris
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/28388] stringify (#) operator broken
2006-07-15 5:17 [Bug preprocessor/28388] New: " sabre at nondot dot org
2006-07-15 5:21 ` [Bug preprocessor/28388] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-15 5:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-15 5:23 ` sabre at nondot dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-15 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-15 05:21 -------
Also without -E, we do warn about the second one:
t.c:2:7: warning: unknown escape sequence '\`'
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/28388] stringify (#) operator broken
2006-07-15 5:17 [Bug preprocessor/28388] New: " sabre at nondot dot org
@ 2006-07-15 5:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-15 5:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-15 5:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-15 05:21 -------
Well it is even worse than that, with the first one, we go into an infinite
loop when you don't use -E.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|stringify (#) operator |stringify (#) operator
|broken |broken
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28388
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-06 12:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-28388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2023-02-06 12:19 ` [Bug preprocessor/28388] stringify (#) operator broken rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-06 12:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2006-07-15 5:17 [Bug preprocessor/28388] New: " sabre at nondot dot org
2006-07-15 5:21 ` [Bug preprocessor/28388] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-15 5:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-15 5:23 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2006-07-15 5:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-15 5:26 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2007-10-29 19:49 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).