public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types
       [not found] <bug-29040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2013-10-14 18:05 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-10-14 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29040

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org        |
      Known to fail|                            |

--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
To be clear: the issue isn't access control of subclasses per se: the real
issue is about access control for 'struct n' vs 'n' when the declaration of p
is parsed: 'struct n' is handled like 'struct whatever', is accepted without
even performing a lookup. Indeed, changing 'struct n' to 'n' per normal C++ for
this kind of code, leads to the expected error message. I think that accepting
'struct n' without lookup and thus without access control in this kind of code
used to be legal in cfront.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types
       [not found] <bug-29040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2013-10-14 18:05 ` [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-07-16 13:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-22 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29040

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.9.0                       |4.9.1

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.0 has been released


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types
       [not found] <bug-29040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2013-10-14 18:05 ` [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-16 13:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-10-30 10:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-16 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29040

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.9.1                       |4.9.2

--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.1 has been released.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types
       [not found] <bug-29040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-07-16 13:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-10-30 10:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-06-26 20:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-30 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29040

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.9.2                       |4.9.3

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.2 has been released.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types
       [not found] <bug-29040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-10-30 10:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-06-26 20:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29040

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types
       [not found] <bug-29040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-06-26 20:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-06-26 21:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-02-16 18:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29040

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.9.3                       |4.9.4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types
       [not found] <bug-29040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-06-26 20:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 21:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-02-16 18:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29040

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.9.4                       |---


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types
       [not found] <bug-29040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-06-26 21:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-16 18:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-16 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29040

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
           Assignee|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com    |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types
  2006-09-12 20:03 [Bug c++/29040] New: " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-12 20:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-12 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-12 20:59 -------
Confirmed, not a regression.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
      Known to fail|                            |2.95.3 3.4.0 3.0.4 3.3.3
                   |                            |3.2.3 4.0.0 4.1.0 4.2.0
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-09-12 20:59:08
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29040


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-16 18:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-29040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-10-14 18:05 ` [Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-16 13:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-30 10:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 21:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 18:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2006-09-12 20:03 [Bug c++/29040] New: " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-12 20:59 ` [Bug c++/29040] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).