public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/29144] Missing if-conversion. If-conversion dependent on operand order. Inconsistent if-conversion.
[not found] <bug-29144-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-08-18 21:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 6:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-18 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29144
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |10.1.0, 8.1.0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For i686 (-m32), GCC does cmov for all functions since GCC 8.1.0; with GCC 10+
having the best code gen so far (there is another bug report about improving
similar functions already).
For x86_64, GCC does cmov for all functions since GCC 4.6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/29144] Missing if-conversion. If-conversion dependent on operand order. Inconsistent if-conversion.
[not found] <bug-29144-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-08-18 21:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/29144] Missing if-conversion. If-conversion dependent on operand order. Inconsistent if-conversion pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-06-02 6:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-02 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29144
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |64700
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=64700
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
a, c is really just another case of PR 64700.
b and d are already optimized on the gimple level by PRE to:
```
_10 = a_4(D) - b_5(D);
if (c_3(D) != 0)
goto <bb 4>; [50.00%]
else
goto <bb 3>; [50.00%]
<bb 3> [local count: 536870913]:
r_7 = o_6(D) + _10;
<bb 4> [local count: 1073741824]:
# r_2 = PHI <_10(2), r_7(3)>
```
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64700
[Bug 64700] Sink common code through PHI
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/29144] Missing if-conversion. If-conversion dependent on operand order. Inconsistent if-conversion.
2006-09-19 15:51 [Bug c/29144] New: " Hakon dot Bugge at scali dot com
@ 2009-02-06 20:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-06 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-06 20:58 -------
The "near obvious cse" cases are not obvious (requires reassociation). To make
them redundant, you need code hoisting.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |23286
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-02-06 20:58:37
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29144
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-02 6:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-29144-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-08-18 21:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/29144] Missing if-conversion. If-conversion dependent on operand order. Inconsistent if-conversion pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 6:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2006-09-19 15:51 [Bug c/29144] New: " Hakon dot Bugge at scali dot com
2009-02-06 20:58 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/29144] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).