[Bug fortran/31580] Better error message for not-found operator

[Bug fortran/31580] Better error message for not-found operator

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31580

--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom Tromey <tromey@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca2f7c84927f85b95f0f48f82b93f1460c372db4

commit r14-9760-gca2f7c84927f85b95f0f48f82b93f1460c372db4
Author: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Date:   Sat Mar 30 13:48:30 2024 -0600

    libiberty: Invoke D demangler when --format=auto

    Investigating GDB PR d/31580 showed that the libiberty demangler
    doesn't automatically demangle D mangled names.  However, I think it
    should -- like C++ and Rust (new-style), D mangled names are readily
    distinguished by the leading "_D", and so the likelihood of confusion
    is low.  The other non-"auto" cases in this code are Ada (where the
    encoded form could more easily be confused by ordinary programs) and
    Java (which is long gone, but which also shared the C++ mangling and
    thus was just an output style preference).

    This patch also fixed another GDB bug, though of course that part
    won't apply to the GCC repository.

    Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31580
    Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30276

    libiberty
            * cplus-dem.c (cplus_demangle): Try the D demangler with
            "auto" format.
            * testsuite/d-demangle-expected: Add --format=auto test.

[Bug fortran/31580] Better error message for not-found operator

[dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-06-29 19:09 -------
Fixed in trunk, no backport. Closing.


-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31580

[Bug fortran/31580] Better error message for not-found operator

[dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-06-29 19:06 -------
Subject: Bug 31580

Author: dfranke
Date: Fri Jun 29 19:05:58 2007
New Revision: 126117

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126117
Log:
gcc/fortran:
2007-06-29  Daniel Franke  <franke.daniel@gmail.com>

        PR fortran/31580
        * resolve.c (resolve_operator): Added check whether a user 
        defined operator is available.

gcc/testsuite:
2007-06-29  Daniel Franke  <franke.daniel@gmail.com>

        PR fortran/31580
        * gfortran.dg/operator_3.f90: New test.


Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/operator_3.f90
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31580

[Bug fortran/31580] Better error message for not-found operator

[patchapp at dberlin dot org]

------- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org  2007-06-29 18:50 -------
Subject: Bug number PR31580

A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg02115.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31580

[Bug fortran/31580] Better error message for not-found operator

[dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2007-04-16 13:37:26         |2007-06-29 18:49:10
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31580

[Bug fortran/31580] Better error message for not-found operator

[tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-16 13:39 -------
I think the simplest fix is rewording the error message to, say,
"No interface found for operator .notfound. with operand types REAL(4)/REAL(4)"


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31580

[Bug fortran/31580] Better error message for not-found operator

[tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-04-16 13:37:26
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31580