public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
       [not found] <bug-32834-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-01-24 15:22 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-01-24 21:32 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-24 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 57023, which changed state.

Bug 57023 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Not packing arrays with changing variable used for size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
       [not found] <bug-32834-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2015-01-24 15:22 ` [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-24 21:32 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-04 14:31 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-24 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 56867, which changed state.

Bug 56867 Summary: Missing temporary with string array assignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
       [not found] <bug-32834-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2015-01-24 15:22 ` [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-01-24 21:32 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-04 14:31 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-06-04 18:58 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-04 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 44735, which changed state.

Bug 44735 Summary: ICE on FORALL with character array pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
       [not found] <bug-32834-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-04 14:31 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-04 18:58 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-06-05 20:42 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-04 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 58749, which changed state.

Bug 58749 Summary: PACK(ADJUSTL([" a"," b"]), [.TRUE.,.FALSE.]) causes an internal compiler error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58749

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
       [not found] <bug-32834-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-06-04 18:58 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-05 20:42 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-05-28  9:50 ` markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-05-16 20:38 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-05 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 66377, which changed state.

Bug 66377 Summary: [F95] Wrong-code with equivalenced array in module
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66377

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
       [not found] <bug-32834-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-06-05 20:42 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-28  9:50 ` markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-05-16 20:38 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-28  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 50392, which changed state.

Bug 50392 Summary: SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
       [not found] <bug-32834-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-05-28  9:50 ` markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-16 20:38 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-16 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 47359, which changed state.

Bug 47359 Summary: Recursive functions of intrinsic names generates invalid assembler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
  2007-07-20  8:13 [Bug fortran/32834] New: [Meta-bugs] " jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-20 17:03 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2007-07-20 17:17 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2007-07-20 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2007-07-20 17:17 -------
from the 19 wrong code bugs I've only retained 8 that I judged as user visible,
F95, and triggered without additional options. 


-- 

jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |30625, 31205, 31211, 31487,
                   |                            |31608


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
  2007-07-20  8:13 [Bug fortran/32834] New: [Meta-bugs] " jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
  2007-07-20 12:25 ` [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-07-20 16:42 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-20 17:03 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
  2007-07-20 17:17 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2007-07-20 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2007-07-20 17:02 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Should we open another PR for wrong-code errors?

no, I overlooked that keyword, and they belong to this category (though I'll
again  ignore arch specific ones). I'll add them to the list shortly. 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
  2007-07-20  8:13 [Bug fortran/32834] New: [Meta-bugs] " jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
  2007-07-20 12:25 ` [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-20 16:42 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-07-20 17:03 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
  2007-07-20 17:17 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-20 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-07-20 16:42 -------
Should we open another PR for wrong-code errors?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
  2007-07-20  8:13 [Bug fortran/32834] New: [Meta-bugs] " jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2007-07-20 12:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-07-20 16:42 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-20 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |meta-bug
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-07-20 12:25:13
               date|                            |
            Summary|[Meta-bugs] 'Fortran 95'-   |[Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only
                   |only failures               |failures


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-16 20:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-32834-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-01-24 15:22 ` [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-24 21:32 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-04 14:31 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-04 18:58 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-05 20:42 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-28  9:50 ` markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-16 20:38 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2007-07-20  8:13 [Bug fortran/32834] New: [Meta-bugs] " jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2007-07-20 12:25 ` [Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-20 16:42 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-20 17:03 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2007-07-20 17:17 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).