public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag
[not found] <bug-33193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-11-18 16:26 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-18 16:34 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-18 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Froyd <froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-18 16:25:04 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Thu Nov 18 16:24:56 2010
New Revision: 166909
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166909
Log:
gcc/
PR c/33193
* c-typeck.c (build_unary_op): Call build_real_imag_expr for
REALPART_EXPR and IMAGPART_EXPR.
gcc/c-family/
PR c/33193
* c-common.h (build_real_imag_expr): Declare.
* c-semantics.c (build_real_imag_expr): Define.
gcc/cp/
PR c/33193
* typeck.c (cp_build_unary_op): Call build_real_imag_expr for
REALPART_EXPR and IMAGPART_EXPR.
gcc/testsuite/
PR c/33193
* c-c++-common/pr33193.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr33193.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-family/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-family/c-common.h
trunk/gcc/c-family/c-semantics.c
trunk/gcc/c-typeck.c
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag
[not found] <bug-33193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-11-18 16:26 ` [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-18 16:34 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-18 17:22 ` sabre at nondot dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-18 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
Nathan Froyd <froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Froyd <froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-18 16:26:07 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag
[not found] <bug-33193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-11-18 16:26 ` [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-18 16:34 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-18 17:22 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2022-01-02 6:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sabre at nondot dot org @ 2010-11-18 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #6 from Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot dot org> 2010-11-18 17:15:32 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Complex.html#Complex still does not
document what arguments are accepted to __real and __imag.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag
[not found] <bug-33193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-18 17:22 ` sabre at nondot dot org
@ 2022-01-02 6:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 1:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-02 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED
Keywords| |documentation
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Chris Lattner from comment #6)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Complex.html#Complex still does not
> document what arguments are accepted to __real and __imag.
I think the documentation is clear here though:
"a complex-valued expression exp".
This means the type that is accepted is "_Complex type", which can be prompted
from type.
Maybe we should add that scalar types can be prompted to _Complex types just to
make it fully clear what is allowed. Let me take a stab at that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag
[not found] <bug-33193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-02 6:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-03 1:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 17:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-03 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
| |il/gcc-patches/2022-January
| |/587531.html
Keywords| |patch
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Patch posted with the rewrite:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/587531.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag
[not found] <bug-33193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-03 1:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-03 17:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 17:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-01 17:23 ` sabre at nondot dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-03 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4003ecbcedca2c36de762a8171b90a7969edce82
commit r12-6192-g4003ecbcedca2c36de762a8171b90a7969edce82
Author: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
Date: Mon Jan 3 01:40:34 2022 +0000
Revamp documentation for _Complex types extension
While cleaning up the bug database, I noticed there was a request
to improve the documentation of the _Complex type extensions.
So I rewrote part of the documentation to make things clearer on
__real/__imag and even added documentation about casts between
the scalar and the complex type.
I moved the documentation of __builtin_complex under this section
too because it makes more sense than having it in the other
built-in section and reference it.
OK? Built make info and make html and checked out the results to
make sure the tables look decent.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR c/33193
* doc/extend.texi: Extend the documentation about Complex
types for casting and also rewrite the __real__/__imag__
expression portion to use tables.
Move __builtin_complex to the Complex type section.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag
[not found] <bug-33193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-03 17:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-03 17:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-01 17:23 ` sabre at nondot dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-03 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag
[not found] <bug-33193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-03 17:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-02-01 17:23 ` sabre at nondot dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sabre at nondot dot org @ 2022-02-01 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
--- Comment #11 from Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot dot org> ---
Cool, thanks for tidying this up Andrew!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag
2007-08-26 5:26 [Bug c/33193] New: " sabre at nondot dot org
2007-08-26 5:28 ` [Bug c/33193] " sabre at nondot dot org
2007-08-26 14:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-14 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-14 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-14 23:29 -------
Here is a small example:
struct a {float x, y; };
struct a f(struct a b)
{
return __real b;
}
int f1(int *b)
{
return __imag b - __real b;
}
(In reply to comment #1)
> Further, http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Complex.html#Complex does not
> document what arguments are accepted to __real and __imag at all.
It should be the same as the functions creal and cimag functions support.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag
2007-08-26 5:26 [Bug c/33193] New: " sabre at nondot dot org
2007-08-26 5:28 ` [Bug c/33193] " sabre at nondot dot org
@ 2007-08-26 14:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-14 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-08-26 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-26 14:57 -------
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |accepts-invalid
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-08-26 14:57:20
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag
2007-08-26 5:26 [Bug c/33193] New: " sabre at nondot dot org
@ 2007-08-26 5:28 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2007-08-26 14:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-14 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sabre at nondot dot org @ 2007-08-26 5:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from sabre at nondot dot org 2007-08-26 05:28 -------
Further, http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Complex.html#Complex does not
document what arguments are accepted to __real and __imag at all.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-01 17:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-33193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-11-18 16:26 ` [Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-18 16:34 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-18 17:22 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2022-01-02 6:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 1:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 17:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 17:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-01 17:23 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2007-08-26 5:26 [Bug c/33193] New: " sabre at nondot dot org
2007-08-26 5:28 ` [Bug c/33193] " sabre at nondot dot org
2007-08-26 14:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-14 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).