public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248
@ 2011-02-24 23:57 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2011-02-27 19:57 ` [Bug lto/47888] " d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (12 more replies)
  0 siblings, 13 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2011-02-24 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

           Summary: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in
                    array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: lto
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: d.g.gorbachev@gmail.com


Created attachment 23461
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23461
Testcase

$ gcc -O -flto -DPR47888 main.c s.c
[...]
main.c:5:5: error: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed
&s[n.1_2main.c:5:5: internal compiler error: tree check: expected array_type,
have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248
[...]


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
@ 2011-02-27 19:57 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2011-04-03 18:41 ` [Bug lto/47888] [4.6/4.7 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2011-02-27 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> 2011-02-27 19:54:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23484
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23484
Backtrace


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.6/4.7 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2011-02-27 19:57 ` [Bug lto/47888] " d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
@ 2011-04-03 18:41 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2011-04-06  0:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2011-04-03 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> 2011-04-03 18:41:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 23863
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23863
Backtrace from GCC 4.7.0 20110402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.6/4.7 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2011-02-27 19:57 ` [Bug lto/47888] " d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2011-04-03 18:41 ` [Bug lto/47888] [4.6/4.7 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
@ 2011-04-06  0:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-06-12 12:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-06  0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.6/4.7 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-06  0:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-12 12:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-06-27 15:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-12 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P4
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.06.12 12:59:09
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-12 12:59:09 UTC ---
Confirmed.  I suppose we could diagnose this somehow.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.6/4.7 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-06-12 12:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-27 15:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-10-26 17:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-27 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.6.1                       |4.6.2

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-27 12:33:03 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.1 is being released.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.6/4.7 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-06-27 15:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-10-26 17:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-10-26 19:31 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-10-26 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.6.2                       |4.6.3

--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-26 17:13:48 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.2 is being released.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.6/4.7 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-10-26 17:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-10-26 19:31 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2012-03-01 15:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2011-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> 2011-10-26 19:30:50 UTC ---
Disappeared in trunk between rr. 178135 and 178749.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.6/4.7 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-10-26 19:31 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
@ 2012-03-01 15:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-04-12 15:16 ` [Bug lto/47888] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-01 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.6.3                       |4.6.4

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-01 14:38:55 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.3 is being released.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-03-01 15:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-04-12 15:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-01-09 23:07 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-12 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.6.4                       |4.7.4

--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-12 15:16:11 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.4 has been released and the branch has been closed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-04-12 15:16 ` [Bug lto/47888] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-09 23:07 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-01-10 18:48 ` [Bug lto/47888] [4.6 " aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-09 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING
                 CC|                            |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No ICE on 4.[789]:

reynosa:/build/pristine-4_8/gcc$ ./xgcc -B./ main.c s.c  -flto -O -DPR47888
main.c:1:13: warning: type of 's' does not match original declaration [enabled
by default]
 extern char s[1];
             ^
s.c:1:14: note: previously declared here
 struct S { } s;
              ^
This only seems to be a problem on 4.6.  Can we mark this as so?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-01-09 23:07 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-10 18:48 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-01-11  9:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-22  8:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-10 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
            Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]    |[4.6 Regression] tree
                   |tree check: expected        |check: expected array_type,
                   |array_type, have            |have record_type in
                   |record_type in              |array_ref_low_bound, at
                   |array_ref_low_bound, at     |expr.c:6249 / Segmentation
                   |expr.c:6249 / Segmentation  |fault
                   |fault                       |

--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Can't reproduce on 4.[789].  This must be a 4.6 thing.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-01-10 18:48 ` [Bug lto/47888] [4.6 " aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-11  9:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-22  8:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-11  9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The things to do are to add the testcase to the testsuite and to close the PR.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/47888] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault
  2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-01-11  9:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-22  8:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-22  8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
4.6 isn't supported anymore.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-22  8:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-24 23:57 [Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-02-27 19:57 ` [Bug lto/47888] " d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-04-03 18:41 ` [Bug lto/47888] [4.6/4.7 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-04-06  0:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-12 12:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 15:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-26 17:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-26 19:31 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-03-01 15:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-12 15:16 ` [Bug lto/47888] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-09 23:07 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-10 18:48 ` [Bug lto/47888] [4.6 " aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-11  9:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-22  8:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).