public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/50542] New: gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536 (r178939)
@ 2011-09-27 14:29 zeccav at gmail dot com
2013-06-22 15:17 ` [Bug fortran/50542] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2021-02-27 8:58 ` zeccav at gmail dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: zeccav at gmail dot com @ 2011-09-27 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50542
Bug #: 50542
Summary: gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536
(r178939)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: zeccav@gmail.com
! gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536 (r178939)
! Fortran 2003 R528
! Fortran 2008 R538
type t
integer g
end type
type(t) u
data (u%g,j=1,1) /1/! violates R536: data-i-do-object cannot be a scalar
data (ii,j=1,1) /1/ ! ditto
end
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/50542] gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536 (r178939)
2011-09-27 14:29 [Bug fortran/50542] New: gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536 (r178939) zeccav at gmail dot com
@ 2013-06-22 15:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2021-02-27 8:58 ` zeccav at gmail dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-22 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50542
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-06-22
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Still present at revision 200321.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/50542] gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536 (r178939)
2011-09-27 14:29 [Bug fortran/50542] New: gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536 (r178939) zeccav at gmail dot com
2013-06-22 15:17 ` [Bug fortran/50542] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2021-02-27 8:58 ` zeccav at gmail dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: zeccav at gmail dot com @ 2021-02-27 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50542
--- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca <zeccav at gmail dot com> ---
Still present in version 11.
The compilers NAG nagfor and Intel ifort detect the issue.
ifort -S -w gfbug82.f -warn stderrors
gfbug82.f(9): error #8252: A DATA implied-DO variable must be an array element
or scalar structure component that has at least one subscript list.
data (u%g,j=1,1) /1/! violates R536: data-i-do-object cannot be a scalar
------------^
gfbug82.f(10): error #8252: A DATA implied-DO variable must be an array element
or scalar structure component that has at least one subscript list.
data (ii,j=1,1) /1/ ! ditto
------------^
compilation aborted for gfbug82.f (code 1)
[vitti f95]$nagfor -S -w gfbug82.f
NAG Fortran Compiler Release 7.0(Yurakucho) Build 7042
Error: gfbug82.f, line 10: Syntax error
detected at II@,
[NAG Fortran Compiler pass 1 error termination, 1 error]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-27 8:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-27 14:29 [Bug fortran/50542] New: gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536 (r178939) zeccav at gmail dot com
2013-06-22 15:17 ` [Bug fortran/50542] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2021-02-27 8:58 ` zeccav at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).