public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/50655] New: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris
@ 2011-10-07 10:29 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-07 15:02 ` [Bug target/50655] " davem at davemloft dot net
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-10-07 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
Bug #: 50655
Summary: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ro@gcc.gnu.org
CC: davem@davemloft.net, ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org
Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.1[01]
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.1[01]
Build: sparc-sun-solaris2.1[01]
As of rev 179598, many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris 10 and 11,
both with Sun as and gas 2.21.1:
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/cmask.c scan-assembler cmask8\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/cmask.c scan-assembler cmask16\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/cmask.c scan-assembler cmask32\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/combined-1.c scan-assembler-times fandnot1\\t% 4
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/combined-1.c scan-assembler-times for\\t% 4
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/combined-1.c scan-assembler-times fxor\\t% 4
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fhadds\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fhaddd\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fhsubs\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fhsubd\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fnhadds\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c scan-assembler fnhaddd\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c scan-assembler fnadds\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c scan-assembler fnaddd\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c scan-assembler fnmuls\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c scan-assembler fnmuld\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c scan-assembler fnsmuld\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpadds16\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpadds16s\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpsubs16\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpsubs16s\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpadds32\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpadds32s\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpsubs32\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c scan-assembler fpsubs32s\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsll16\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fslas16\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsrl16\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsra16\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsll32\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fslas32\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsrl32\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c scan-assembler fsra32\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fucmp.c scan-assembler fucmple8\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fucmp.c scan-assembler fucmpne8\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fucmp.c scan-assembler fucmpgt8\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/fucmp.c scan-assembler fucmpeq8\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/lzd.c scan-assembler-times lzd\\t% 3
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c scan-assembler fchksm16\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c scan-assembler pdistn\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c scan-assembler fmean16\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c scan-assembler fpadd64\\t%
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c scan-assembler fpsub64\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/xmul.c scan-assembler umulxhi\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/xmul.c scan-assembler xmulx\\t%
FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/xmul.c scan-assembler xmulxhi\\t%
The problem seems to be the same everywhere:
$ /var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/gcc/xgcc
-B/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/gcc/
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/cmask.c
-mcpu=niagara3 -mvis -S -o cmask.s
$ grep cmask cmask.s
.file "cmask.c"
call __builtin_vis_cmask8, 0
call __builtin_vis_cmask16, 0
call __builtin_vis_cmask32, 0
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/50655] Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris
2011-10-07 10:29 [Bug target/50655] New: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-10-07 15:02 ` davem at davemloft dot net
2011-10-07 15:17 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: davem at davemloft dot net @ 2011-10-07 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #1 from David S. Miller <davem at davemloft dot net> 2011-10-07 15:01:55 UTC ---
Please try to figure out why the configure test is not detecting VIS3
instruction capabilities in your assembler. That's why the VIS3 tests are
failing.
The combined-1.c test is not a VIS3 test, and is failing because of a known
register allocator issue that Eric has asked Vlad to look into.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/50655] Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris
2011-10-07 10:29 [Bug target/50655] New: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-07 15:02 ` [Bug target/50655] " davem at davemloft dot net
@ 2011-10-07 15:17 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-10-07 16:48 ` davem at davemloft dot net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-10-07 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-10-07 15:16:16 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from David S. Miller <davem at davemloft dot net> 2011-10-07 15:01:55 UTC ---
> Please try to figure out why the configure test is not detecting VIS3
> instruction capabilities in your assembler. That's why the VIS3 tests are
> failing.
On both Solaris 10 and 11, as complains:
configure:24069: /usr/ccs/bin/as -xarch=v9d -o conftest.o conftest.s >&5
/usr/ccs/bin/as: "conftest.s", line 4: error: detect global register use not
cov
ered .register pseudo-op
/usr/ccs/bin/as: "conftest.s", line 4: error: detect global register use not
cov
ered .register pseudo-op
configure:24072: $? = 1
Adding
.register %g2, #scratch
.register %g3, #scratch
to the testcase allows the test to be assembled without error.
The Solaris 8 and 9 as errors out with
as: error: unknown option 'xarch=v9d'
usage: as [-V] [-Q{y,n}] [-f[O][if]#] [-q] [-s]
[-S] [-K {pic,PIC}] [-o objfile] [-L] [-T]
[-P [[-Ipath] [-Dname] [-Dname=def] [-Uname]]...]
[-m [-Ym,path]] [-n] [-ul] [-xF] [-xarch=v7] [-xarch=v8] [-xarch=v8a]
[-xarch=v8plus] [-xarch=v8plusa] [-xarch=v8plusb] [-xarch=v9] [-xarch=v9a]
[-xarch=v9b] [-xcode={pic13,pic32}] file.s...
With gas 2.21.1, I get this failure instead:
configure:24069: /vol/gcc/bin/gas-2.21.1 -xarch=v9d -o conftest.o conftest.s
>
&5
Assembler messages:
Error: invalid architecture -xarch=v9d
Error: unrecognized option -\300v9d
configure:24072: $? = 1
Given that even the latest released gas doesn't support those insns, I
think the testsuite needs to accomodate the possibility that the
assembler used doesn't understand them.
> The combined-1.c test is not a VIS3 test, and is failing because of a known
> register allocator issue that Eric has asked Vlad to look into.
Ok, thanks.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/50655] Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris
2011-10-07 10:29 [Bug target/50655] New: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-07 15:02 ` [Bug target/50655] " davem at davemloft dot net
2011-10-07 15:17 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-10-07 16:48 ` davem at davemloft dot net
2011-10-07 16:52 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: davem at davemloft dot net @ 2011-10-07 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #3 from David S. Miller <davem at davemloft dot net> 2011-10-07 16:45:52 UTC ---
Thanks, I'll add the necessary register directives and work on making the
testcases conditional on assembler support.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/50655] Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris
2011-10-07 10:29 [Bug target/50655] New: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-10-07 16:48 ` davem at davemloft dot net
@ 2011-10-07 16:52 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-10-07 17:24 ` davem at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-27 13:26 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-10-07 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-10-07 16:51:36 UTC ---
> --- Comment #3 from David S. Miller <davem at davemloft dot net> 2011-10-07 16:45:52 UTC ---
> Thanks, I'll add the necessary register directives and work on making the
> testcases conditional on assembler support.
Great, thanks.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/50655] Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris
2011-10-07 10:29 [Bug target/50655] New: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-10-07 16:52 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-10-07 17:24 ` davem at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-27 13:26 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: davem at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-10-07 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #5 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 17:23:53 UTC ---
Author: davem
Date: Fri Oct 7 17:23:47 2011
New Revision: 179667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179667
Log:
Fix VIS3 assembler check and conditionalize testsuite on VIS3 support.
gcc/
PR 50655
* configure.ac: Add .register directives to VIS3 test.
* configure: Regenerate.
gcc/testsuite/
PR 50655
* gcc.target/sparc/sparc.exp: Add vis3 target test.
* gcc.target/sparc/cmask.c: Use it.
* gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/sparc/fucmp.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/sparc/lzd.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/sparc/xmul.c: Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/configure
trunk/gcc/configure.ac
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/cmask.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/fhalve.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/fnegop.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/fpadds.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/fshift.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/fucmp.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/lzd.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/sparc.exp
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/vis3misc.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/xmul.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/50655] Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris
2011-10-07 10:29 [Bug target/50655] New: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-10-07 17:24 ` davem at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-10-27 13:26 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-10-27 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
| |atches/2011-10/msg01045.htm
| |l
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-27 13:24:46 UTC ---
.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-27 13:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-07 10:29 [Bug target/50655] New: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-07 15:02 ` [Bug target/50655] " davem at davemloft dot net
2011-10-07 15:17 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-10-07 16:48 ` davem at davemloft dot net
2011-10-07 16:52 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-10-07 17:24 ` davem at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-27 13:26 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).