public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/52094] New: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment and decrement operators with fundamental types vs. classes
@ 2012-02-02 9:59 dicomj23 at gmail dot com
2012-02-02 10:04 ` [Bug c++/52094] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) dicomj23 at gmail dot com
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dicomj23 at gmail dot com @ 2012-02-02 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
Bug #: 52094
Summary: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment
and decrement operators with fundamental types vs.
classes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dicomj23@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/52094] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
2012-02-02 9:59 [Bug c++/52094] New: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment and decrement operators with fundamental types vs. classes dicomj23 at gmail dot com
@ 2012-02-02 10:04 ` dicomj23 at gmail dot com
2012-02-02 10:23 ` [Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dicomj23 at gmail dot com @ 2012-02-02 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
Dico <dicomj23 at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|g++ yields different |internal compiler error:
|behaviour for postfix |Segmentation fault (program
|increment and decrement |cc1plus)
|operators with fundamental |
|types vs. classes |
--- Comment #1 from Dico <dicomj23 at gmail dot com> 2012-02-02 10:04:30 UTC ---
user:$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/4.6.1/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro
4.6.1-9ubuntu3' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.6/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,go --prefix=/usr
--program-suffix=-4.6 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id
--with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext
--enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.6
--libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin
--enable-objc-gc --enable-targets=all --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686
--with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=i686-linux-gnu
--host=i686-linux-gnu --target=i686-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3)
user:$
user$ gcc main.cpp & cat main.cpp
[1] 31057
namespace N { struct A { struct Inner; }; struct Inner {}; }
namespace NN { struct AA : N::A {}; struct AA::Inner : N::Inner {}; }
int main() { return 0; }
user$ gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.6/README.Bugs> for instructions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier
2012-02-02 9:59 [Bug c++/52094] New: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment and decrement operators with fundamental types vs. classes dicomj23 at gmail dot com
2012-02-02 10:04 ` [Bug c++/52094] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) dicomj23 at gmail dot com
@ 2012-02-02 10:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-02 10:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-02 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-02-02
Summary|internal compiler error: |ICE on definition of nested
|Segmentation fault (program |class in wrong namespace
|cc1plus) |scope with wrong
| |nested-name-qualifier
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.4.3, 4.5.2, 4.6.2, 4.7.0
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-02 10:23:24 UTC ---
Reduced:
namespace N { struct A { struct Inner; }; }
namespace NN { struct AA : N::A {}; struct AA::Inner {}; }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier
2012-02-02 9:59 [Bug c++/52094] New: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment and decrement operators with fundamental types vs. classes dicomj23 at gmail dot com
2012-02-02 10:04 ` [Bug c++/52094] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) dicomj23 at gmail dot com
2012-02-02 10:23 ` [Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-02 10:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-02 10:34 ` dicomj23 at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-02 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-02 10:25:54 UTC ---
If the nested class is declared in an enclosing namespace scope (as required)
but still with the nested-name-qualifier of the derived type, G++ accepts it:
namespace N { struct A { struct Inner; }; }
namespace NN { struct AA : N::A {}; }
struct NN::AA::Inner {};
Clang++ and Comeau both reject this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier
2012-02-02 9:59 [Bug c++/52094] New: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment and decrement operators with fundamental types vs. classes dicomj23 at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-02 10:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-02 10:34 ` dicomj23 at gmail dot com
2012-02-02 10:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dicomj23 at gmail dot com @ 2012-02-02 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
--- Comment #4 from Dico <dicomj23 at gmail dot com> 2012-02-02 10:34:41 UTC ---
I agree, but they don't perform a segmentation fault
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier
2012-02-02 9:59 [Bug c++/52094] New: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment and decrement operators with fundamental types vs. classes dicomj23 at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-02 10:34 ` dicomj23 at gmail dot com
@ 2012-02-02 10:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-29 19:15 ` arnaut.billings at yahoo dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-02 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-02 10:43:33 UTC ---
Why do you think I confirmed the bug and changed its status to NEW?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier
2012-02-02 9:59 [Bug c++/52094] New: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment and decrement operators with fundamental types vs. classes dicomj23 at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-02 10:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-09-29 19:15 ` arnaut.billings at yahoo dot com
2020-07-23 14:39 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-04 19:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: arnaut.billings at yahoo dot com @ 2013-09-29 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
arnaut.billings at yahoo dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |arnaut.billings at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #6 from arnaut.billings at yahoo dot com ---
Cygwin gcc (GCC) 4.7.3
Nested class in wrong class with typedef name qualifier also causes a
segmentation fault:
struct Foo
{
struct Impl;
};
struct Bar
{
typedef Foo base_type;
struct base_type::Impl
{
};
};
Note: if "struct base_type::Impl" is changed to "struct Foo::Impl" then it will
produce an error message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier
2012-02-02 9:59 [Bug c++/52094] New: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment and decrement operators with fundamental types vs. classes dicomj23 at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-09-29 19:15 ` arnaut.billings at yahoo dot com
@ 2020-07-23 14:39 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-04 19:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Comment 2 testcase fixed with r11-175.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier
2012-02-02 9:59 [Bug c++/52094] New: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment and decrement operators with fundamental types vs. classes dicomj23 at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-23 14:39 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-04 19:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-04 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #8)
> Comment 2 testcase fixed with r11-175.
And the accepts invalid is recorded as PR 58661.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-04 19:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-02 9:59 [Bug c++/52094] New: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment and decrement operators with fundamental types vs. classes dicomj23 at gmail dot com
2012-02-02 10:04 ` [Bug c++/52094] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) dicomj23 at gmail dot com
2012-02-02 10:23 ` [Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-02 10:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-02 10:34 ` dicomj23 at gmail dot com
2012-02-02 10:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-29 19:15 ` arnaut.billings at yahoo dot com
2020-07-23 14:39 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-04 19:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).